After reading the two articles titled “Why We Don't Like Women Bosses (And Why It Matters)” (Shiao, 2016) and “Men Are they better bosses than women? (No, and here's why.)” (Wolfe, 2017), I think this should be sent to the heads of different departments because it focuses on the ability of women to hold leadership positions and the examples given support the claims of the author. very good, which increases the reliability of the article. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The article written by Lahle Wolfe is more compelling because it focuses on the ability of women to hold leadership positions while the The article written by Vivien Shiao focuses on discrimination against women. In reference to a survey mentioned in the second article conducted by Harvard Business Review, women surpassed men in leadership skills and competencies at all management levels (Wolfe, 2017). This shows that women are better than men in leadership positions. By proving that women are competent as managers, department heads would be more likely to recruit women into management positions because they are confident that female managers can provide better performance at work. In contrast, Shiao's article fails to convince department heads that more women should be recruited into management positions, as it mainly details the discrimination women face and does not provide any positive traits of women as managers. For example, the article mentions that due to the lack of female role models, women in the workforce tend to have less confidence in their own abilities (Shiao, 2016, para. 14). By showing that women have less confidence in their abilities, the article discourages department heads from hiring female managers, because low confidence is generally considered an undesirable trait in management positions and can decrease job performance . Therefore, Wolfe's article is better than Shiao's in convincing department heads because it presents women positively in leadership positions. However, Shiao's article may be more compelling than Wolfe's article because the focus on discrimination against women might appeal to department heads' rationality that women may be capable when we give them the opportunity. According to the article, Shiao asserts that supporting women who aspire to and achieve positions of power can help women become more effective leaders and make room for other women (Shiao, 2016, para. 15). This implies that women are unable to showcase their leadership abilities due to lack of support resulting from female bias. Thus, the focus on discrimination in Shiao's article could lead department heads to view women as competent leaders when given the opportunity. As such, they would support efforts to recruit women into management positions and promote inclusion within the company. Therefore, Shiao's article might be more compelling than Wolfe's because it can gain support for women by appealing to department heads' rationality that women are capable when given the right to do so. 'occasion. Nevertheless, Wolfe's article is more reliable and therefore more convincing than Wolfe's article. Shiao article because Wolfe supports his.