Table of ContentsForensic PsychologyHuman Rights - Military and Enemies of the StateEthical ImplicationsForensic PsychologyRegarding the Discipline of forensic psychology, there are as many, if not more, ethical implications in this area. specific psychological modality then any other modality in the career field. The main reason for this is the variety of "dual relationships, diverse modalities, and conflicting specific policies and procedures that often do not conform to APA psychological guidelines, but which nevertheless remain highly sought after by professional psychologists and therapists." and researchers in the field of “forensic psychology”. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay. Specifically, these workplaces include, but are not limited to, various government agencies, police departments, rehabilitation centers, jails, prisons, law firms. , and private practices. Forensic psychology in its entirety specifically deals with the study as well as application of psychology and law. Human Rights - Military and Enemies of the State Therefore, the involvement of psychologists in military interrogations regarding the topic of human rights is very controversial. at least, since American courts as well as Congress are often reluctant to constrain the executive branch when it limits individual rights in the pursuit of national security" (Shirin, S. (2013, May) despite the rules and APA ethics that govern the psychological profession as a whole. Nevertheless, the public as well as the APA continue to distrust the military environment and psychology professionals who conduct research and work in this environment because "the commanders. and interrogators have often, in the past, requested consultations on the attitudes, personality and behavior of captives and on the methods of obtaining the desired information (Greene & Banks, 2009). and very dangerous to the safety and general well-being of the subject (and as such, violate the APA Psychological Standards. However, it should be noted that very few psychology professionals have ever “received one). specialized training to prepare them for this type of mission” (Greene & Banks, 2009). Additionally, contrary to popular belief, psychology professionals “began helping commanders prevent abusive situations from developing” instead of triggering them (Greene & Banks, 2009). Therefore, Green and Banks argue that the fear that psychological professionals will commit harm to subjects and patients can be traced largely to the emergence of the psychology profession itself (and its respective disciplines). ), back when there were virtually no rules, ethics or codes of conduct. conduct regulating the profession or its practitioners. In a peer-reviewed article titled “Protecting Right from Within? Inspector General and National Security Oversight authored by Shirin and published by The Stanford Law Review. The article asserts that the United States government (including its team of diverse psychological professionals) "now plays an important role in monitoring national security practices restricting individual rights." (Shirin, S. (2013, May). Practices for which such situations are “neutralized” include, but are not limited to, increasing transparency within the agency,identifying specific instances of misconduct and human rights violations, in addition to proving relief. to victims who suffered such ethical violations, holding those responsible accountable for such events if it happens again in the future, and finally addressing current policies by revising them if necessary to prevent further cases of abuse and violations of human rights. As the peer-reviewed article points out. entitled “Ethical GuidelineEvolution in Psychological Support to Interrogation Operations”, psychology professionals work to “analyze and predict terrorist behavior, vulnerability, help local populations understand and cooperate, effectively support and repatriate troops” (Greene & Bank , 2009). soldiers showed improvement through psychological consultations and subsequent therapy sessions” (Greene & Bank, 2009). , accountability, confidentiality, integrity, justice, protection of human rights and the dignity of patients and clients. Additionally, if a psychology professional learns at any time that their work is being misused or misrepresented, they should address the matter by writing letters and speaking personally with the affected parties "requesting retraction of the specifically cited misrepresentations." , or by discussing with appropriate people the corrective measures to be taken” (Fisher, CB 2009). Additionally, the psychology professional must act ethically by verifying that requests are followed and that misrepresentations have been permanently and accurately corrected. , while working on projects, missions, or at military or government installations (as a member of a team), a psychology professional must also “clarify the nature of any “current” and “emerging” conflicts, making known its commitment to ABS. code of ethics by taking “reasonable steps” to resolve conflicts in accordance with the general principles and ethical standards of the code of ethics” (Fisher, CB (2009). As recently as 2010, the association APA has officially amended its Section 1.02, Conflicts Between Ethics and Existing Law, Regulation, or Other Legal Authority following news of psychologists involved in highly humane military interrogations involving torture and unethical treatment prisoners in centers such as Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib As it currently stands, the guideline (Standard 1.02) now requires all psychology professionals to take professional action against (and take a stand against) unfair, harsh and abusive treatment. inhumane treatment of prisoners/patients, essentially "by prohibiting psychological professionals from engaging in acts that would not encourage or justify a violation of human rights" (Fisher, CB, Ph.D., Brodsky, SL, Ph.D., . Neal, TM, Ph.D., Michelle A. Jones, MM, Ph.D., Lichtenstein, B., Ph.D., Kinscherff, RT, Ph.D. and Grisso, TJ, Ph.D. (2013 ). Protecting the rights of servicemembers is also addressed in both the “DoD Directive” and the “DoD Directive.” Instruction” which prevents commander-directed mental health evaluations, informs military personnel of the psychological professional who will conduct their evaluation, recognizes soldiers' right to obtain a copy of the mental health report, the right to a second opinion and right to seek and speak with legal counsel, chaplain, and members of Congress or Senate” (Fisher, CB (2009). Keep in mind: This is just a sample. Get an article now personalized from our expert writers Get a personalized essay Plus, Psychology professionals, as well as..