This presentation will focus on the topic of debate: most immigrants come to the United States simply to get welfare. With more than 40 million people born in another country, the United States has more immigrants than any other country, and the number is only growing. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Why immigrants come to the United States and whether they should be entitled to public assistance and aid social here, this is not a new subject of debate. More recently, the Trump administration's public charge rule calls for the rejection of potential immigrants who are considered eligible for welfare programs, which include: Supplemental Security Income; Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); any federal, state, local, or tribal income maintenance cash benefit program; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); Section 8 Housing assistance through the Housing Choice Voucher Program or project-based rental assistance; and Medicaid. Arguments about why immigrants come to the United States focus on welfare recipient rates within immigrant communities and social magnets or welfare clustering. Because California has more immigrants than any other state and is considered the most generous in welfare, it is also at the center of this debate. Data can be manipulated to support both sides of the argument that immigrants come to the United States for welfare. Federal and state policies restrict the programs that social worker clients can benefit from. Practitioners must understand applicable federal and state policies to effectively advocate for their clients and provide relevant assistance. Furthermore, restricted access to public benefits risks increasing dependence on private social assistance. It is important for social workers working in private and nonprofit agencies to understand the challenges their clients face. This study used data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) to investigate the difference in welfare participation rates between immigrants and natives. Americans. Borjas used CPS data on poverty rates and participation rates in public assistance programs. Child poverty is a leading contributor to low educational attainment, behavioral problems and lower economic income in adulthood. Typically, child poverty persists into adulthood and, subsequently, potential dependence on public assistance. Participating in public assistance as a child has long-term consequences. Notably, exposure to public assistance during childhood may foster a culture of dependency in adulthood. This study found that national origin groups that had high rates of program participation as children are also the national origin groups among which young adults have the highest rates of poverty and program participation. students. Immigrant children have significantly higher poverty rates and, as a result, participate in social programs at higher rates than their native-born peers. Nearly half of immigrant children live in households that receive some form of public assistance, while only one.