We all know that everything in the world is either science or the Bible. These two people are just two of the people who have made great contributions to science. They made it as we know it today. What we don't know is how they are similar and how they are different. Here is some brief information. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Glenn Theodore Seaborg is a very important man of science. He was born April 19, 1912, in Ishpeming, Michigan and died in 1999. Throughout his life, he contributed greatly to science, particularly in chemistry. Seaborg also led nuclear chemistry research at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. Glenn Seaborg won the Nobel Prize in 1951 for discovering new elements in the periodic table. These elements are neptunium, plutonium, americium, curium, berkelium, californium, einsteinium, fermium, mendelevium and nobelium, also known as transuranic elements. Seaborg also rearranged the periodic table to show the relationship between the new elements he discovered and those that already existed on the table. Another reason why Glenn Seaborg is important in chemistry is that he discovered the isotopes of more than 100 elements on the periodic table. He did everything from research to teaching chemistry and contributed greatly to the improvement of science and mathematics. He authored many chemistry books and is said to have made the most significant changes to the periodic table. I believe that the least notable of Democritus' very great contributions was his "atomic theory." Certain quantum phenomena as well. The most remarkable thing about Democritus's atomic theory is that he designed it violating every major tenet of modern science, particularly the importance of empirical observations and "reasonable" testability. random ; everything happens by reason and necessity" is a thought that informs much of Democritus' writings, particularly his assertion that "Everything happens according to necessity" in that atoms function in a certain way and therefore, well sure, that what happens in life does so out of necessity for this operation. The two scientists are not really alike, other than the fact that they have made great scientific discoveries. Another similarity is that they both had a view of atomic structure. They also defied the rules to make their hypothesis true. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, both scientists make great contributions to atomic structure or atomic theories and they are different in many ways. However, they don't really look alike. Science would not be what it is today if these two people did not do what they did.