Since childhood, we begin to hear whispers about an atrocious crime that has taken place and this is associated with people wondering how a human being can commit such a horrible crime and suddenly the death penalty becomes one of their demands and wishes. The death penalty against criminals and dissidents has been widely used in human history in cases of extreme crimes such as murder, treason, terrorism and espionage. The death penalty is practiced in almost all societies: 58 countries apply it and 95 countries do not believe in it. Today, the execution of criminals is to some extent limited, but it remains widely used. Capital punishment has become one of the biggest dilemmas in the world, where people are divided over whether it is ethical or not to carry out such punishment. Although some people consider the death penalty a fair judge, I believe it is unethical to end someone's life. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The first argument is that every person in this world has the right to live, even the person who committed the murder; Sentencing a person to death constitutes a violation of human rights. Capital punishment disregards the sanctity of human life. The human right to life is a primordial right that governs all other existing rights. In its absence, all other fundamental rights have no reason to exist. Also: “Therefore choose life, that you and your descendants may live. » comes to endorse the importance of human life. From here, the following question can be asked: who are we to choose to end a person's life and deprive them of their major right? The government should not give itself the right to kill human beings, especially when it kills with premeditation and ceremony, in the name of the law or in the name of its citizens, and when it does so in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner. This degrading, inhuman and cruel punishment is inflicted in the name of justice; However, the goal of justice is to protect freedom, property and life which are not respected when applying the death penalty. Second, the death penalty executed people who were not guilty. If this continues, more and more innocent people will die. According to the Death Penalty Information Center (1993), since 1973, more than 160 people have been released from death row with proof of their not guilty. From 2000 to 2011, there were an average of five exemptions per year. The justice system is not always 100% correct. Sometimes juries convict innocent people. For example, Cameron Todd Willingham was convicted of arson. In 2004, he was executed and later found that the evidence had been misinterpreted. In many cases, corruption has reached the courts and justice system, where innocent people have been killed. Once the person is executed, nothing can be returned, the mistake is made and there is no way back. Furthermore, would we accept that some people suffer death for what is considered a non-crime in their home? The ordinary citizen sent abroad to work or study abroad may carry out some of the actions considered normal in his hometown: however, these actions are considered illegal and eccentric and are associated with the death penalty in as punishment. Third, retribution is a brutal way of our justice system by which they punish those who commit crimes and that the.