Article 25 of the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for his or her health and well-being of himself and his loved ones. family, including food, clothing, housing, medical care and necessary social services. » Article 25 basically says that everyone has the right to access all of these resources, because they are their civil rights and they are entitled to them. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay That being said, many people think that healthcare is a privilege. Health care should be declared as a right and everyone should have the right to proper health care and not be subjected to medical treatment or not due to their financial status. For the United States to function properly and for its citizens to assist and contribute to the social, economic, and political goals of this country, American citizens must be healthy to ensure that these goals are achieved. If the American Dream is ever to be realized, healthcare in the country must become a priority. Despite the fact that the government, under many different administrations, has not addressed and ignored the issue of health care for all. To ensure health care for all, the entire system must be reformed. The government must make health care for all a priority and it must facilitate health care to ensure health, regardless of a person's economic situation, because it is a civil right. Although some may think that health care is the responsibility of individual citizens, in reality the government should provide free health care to all Americans. The history of healthcare dates back to the 19th century in Germany. In a lecture given by Karen S. Palmer, she states: "As the United States continually tried to adapt and create a functioning health care system, it was always on the verge of perfecting it, but failed to perfect it. The first to establish some sort of health system was Germany in 1883, with compulsory health insurance. “It was one of the first health systems for workers. Other European countries, such as Austria, Great Britain and Norway, followed until 1912. Sweden joined in 1891, Denmark in 1892, France in 1910 and Switzerland in 1912. Nevertheless , many European countries have adopted some form of healthcare for a period of time. . The main reason why all these health care programs broke out in different European countries was the need to stabilize income, as well as protection against loss of wages in the event of illness rather than paying medical costs. At that time, the federal government left responsibility for everything related to health care to the states. In which states left them to private or voluntary programs. The United States did, however, use some voluntary funds to provide for its members in the event of illness or death. Although there were no legislative or public programs in the late 19th or early 20th century in the United States (Palmer). Palmer also says, “At that time, the Progressive Era was upon the United States. Reformers worked more to improve the social conditions of the working class than any other reform movement such as health care. However, the working class did not enjoy much support for broad social insurance in the country. THELabor and socialist party support for health insurance or health benefit funds and programs was much more fragmented than in Europe. Additionally, early health insurance proposals in the country were not politically debated under anti-socialist sponsorship as was the case in Europe. Although the United States is becoming a global power, most health reform initiatives and legislation have occurred outside of the federal government (Palmer). Efforts to provide health care reform had always been discussed during previous presidencies, but were not actually implemented until 1945, when President Truman proposed to Congress in November 1945 that the United States had need a new health care program. In this proposal, he said the federal government should play a role in universal health care. Trump was unable to establish a useful health care system during his presidency. But the next president, Lyndon B Johnson, was able to establish health care for the elderly and the needy. Although this seemed like an effort toward a universal health care system, it was not enough. In the United States, middle-class families still lacked health care and life expectancy was still low. This helped ensure that health care reform could only move forward from this point forward. Now, in the 21st century, after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or ObamaCare, took effect, it has reformed health insurance with the goal of near-universal coverage. Since ObamaCare provided subsidies, health insurance has been able to become affordable. ObamaCare emphasized preventative care. This allowed more people to receive treatment before more expensive emergency care became an option. But now the Trump administration has repeatedly tried to pass legislation that would overturn the Affordable Care Act. The current administration undermined the law when it said it would no longer continue funding a widely used category of grants without appropriations from Congress. ObamaCare was intended to make payments and deductible costs easier for many low-income Americans who purchased health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act. The estimated cost of the payments was 9 billion the following year and would reach almost 100 billion over the next decade. Many Americans do not agree with the repeal of this law because it gave them the confidence to pay for things they would not be able to pay for on their own. “Like insulin, cancer treatments or medical surgeries. » (Amadeo) October 12, 2017, Currently, states have their own specific healthcare regulations, making it costly for national insurance companies to do business in different states. As a result, five companies serve half of the insured population in the United States. The president suggested that increased competition would diminish monopoly power, while reducing costs. However, large companies would be the only ones with the ability to operate across state lines under the current policy. “Therefore, if it becomes easier for them, they will increase prices. With rising prices, not all Americans would be able to afford health care with this new revised approach” (Amadeo). Understanding the context of universal health care helps us understand how, as the United States grew over the years to become a large.