“The impact of the current age of criminal responsibility on young people aged 16 and 17 affects them for the rest of their life. Whether it is increasing the chances of progressing in studies or obtaining a job, it is clear that raising the age of responsibility will have a great benefit for society. The report published by the Independent Democratic Conference shows that in addition to this societal benefit, the state will also benefit from a financial benefit. During this legislative session, we will work with advocates and stakeholders to find a legislative solution to this problem,” Senator Klein. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay It is alarming to see the sharp increase in crimes committed by juveniles in today's society. It is obvious that some sentences imposed on minors do not really correspond to the crime they committed and can have a negative impact on them. For this reason, the article chosen to review is entitled. "New York just changed the way it prosecutes children, but some were left behind: under Raise the Age." There are children in the same situation who are treated completely differently. Written by Cassi Feldman and published in The Apea. This article is one of many written by Cassi Feldman. Ms. Feldman is a highly established, decorated and award-winning public interest journalist. His experience in journalism spans several years. She spent many years as an associate producer at CBS News' 60 Minutes and also worked as an editor at City Limits magazine, a reporter for the San Francisco Bay Guardian, and a reporter for the New York Times. She is currently the editor-in-chief of The Appeal, a nonprofit criminal justice news outlet that focuses on local drivers of mass incarceration. This article “New York Just Changed How It Prosecutes Kids, But Some Were Left Behind: Under Raise the Age. There are children in the same situation who are treated completely differently,” explores the New York justice system and the harsh manner in which juvenile cases are handled. He highlighted and emphasized the fact that some juvenile offenses do not warrant punishment. It also analyzes and explains the fact that although the law has changed, many minors will not benefit from this change because the new law does not apply to crimes committed before its appearance. This article describes different aspects in which minors received harsh sentences. no matter how insignificant the crime. In the introductory paragraph, the author used a non-fictional narrative scenario in which the minor's name was changed. Throughout the article, the author seeks to highlight different cases in which young people have been sentenced to cruel punishment for something as simple as taking food. The main idea of ​​each paragraph has been highlighted and rephrased at the end of each paragraph to draw readers' attention to key issues. As the article continues, it is evident that it was informative but it also appealed to our descriptive sense. Along with real-life scenarios, Feldman has increasingly solicited and used different perspectives from advocates to help him shed light on this crucial issue. These individuals have first-hand knowledge of this issue and, as such, the interviews she conducted with them were intended to help her effectively bring these issues to the forefront. It also gave readers, 2019