Studies that involve bilingual acquisition studies highlight the frequency of perception that language one is stable while language two is compelling because it experiences changes in its development. These studies call into question the stability of language one in a context where there is frequent activation of both languages. Multilingualism is dynamic from a person's perspective, and the lives of multilingual speakers involve language access and interaction in both languages. According to Schmid and Kopke, coactivation is the starting point for the dynamic nature of bilingualism that can lead to bidirectional cross-linguistic effects. When one applies a Jackendoffian approach to the study of human languages, the interplay between coactivation in lexical studies and cross-linguistic influence at phonological levels is not surprising. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Heritage speakers and attritors fall within the spectrum of bilingualism that ranges from bilinguals with sustained verbal access and activation in both languages ​​to bilinguals with limited access and activation in only one language. The process of activation and inhibition may be more or less difficult for different people depending on the similarity of language features and combinatorial rules. Due to cross-linguistic similarities, the author of the article proposes ideas for incorporating input, coactivation and logical representation into a single model. In such a model, changes in input and levels of coactivation can have an effect on the integration of features of different linguistic components. This integration leads to a range of interface rules within a language. This article explains more about how a person can learn two languages. The process involves borrowing from both languages ​​to create an integration that will generate a continuum of rules in both languages ​​learned..