My family has never had a problem with the Second Amendment, nor with guns in general. In fact, my mother and her boyfriend each own a firearm for defensive purposes. One of the first mature discussions I had with my parents was about who should or should not own guns; we all agree that mentally unstable people should not own one. My opinion has never changed since that discussion about five years ago. After all, why would you give a gun to someone who is known for lashing out and becoming very violent? After asking this rhetorical question to someone who advocates for gun rights, they will likely continue to encourage that everyone should have a gun and that there should not be more restrictions on them. get one. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Guns are dangerous. There is no doubt about it. But it is possible to make them less dangerous by keeping them out of the hands of those who will use them primarily to harm rather than defend themselves. This is the message that Michael Moore describes in his documentary Bowling for Columbine. This film attempts to convince gun rights activists that gun restrictions are absolutely necessary, using heavy sarcasm and bursts of satire to even try to make some of them look like fools. I feel like this was effective because even though it was sarcasm, it raises valid points and expresses a legitimate concern about the right to own guns in the United States. Although some may disagree with the information in this film, I completely agree with it. Throughout the film, Moore uses the Columbine High School shooting on April 20, 1999, as an example of how dangerous guns can be when they get into the wrong hands. . And when I say “given,” I mean given. The film opens with pathos and visuals, showing Moore himself applying for a bank account at a bank (which was also a licensed gun dealer) that offered free guns to anyone who opened one. The fact that guns are so easy to obtain is the pathos Moore uses; it makes the audience think, "wow, I wonder what crazy person in my town got a gun that easily?" What would they do with that kind of firepower? Moore continues to make the audience think like the last when he receives the gun and begins pointing it inside the bank, giving the audience visuals to add to the already existing pathos. Moore also uses elements of sarcasm to continue the film's build on pathos. Various combinations of ironic visual and audio components prove this, such as the Beatles' "Happiness is a Warm Gun" and Louis Armstrong's "(What a) Wonderful World" as background music for videos of violent shootouts and war, obviously contradicting each other each. other. Playing happy songs against the video of people being injured and dying because of people shooting them with guns. This gives the public the impression that guns don't cause happiness or make the world a better place at all, and that they only harm others. This also makes gun rights activists look ridiculous, since they always say that guns are a basic human necessity/right and that guns.