Table of contentsIntroductionConclusionReferenceIntroductionDefending human rights, developing international human rights standards, monitoring human rights violations Human rights, service delivery and activism on human rights issues are the main functions of several non-governmental organizations (NGOs). ), especially in third world countries. In the globalized world order, NGOs tend to bridge the geographic and institutional gaps existing between sovereign states and the international community for individuals and communities who deserve to enjoy their rights guaranteed by the Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations (UNHRD). NGOs apply either internal or external strategies, often hybrid strategies to achieve their objective when working with state authorities. It is imperative to examine the influence of these NGOs in the human rights system and how they operate effectively in different political situations. Although the growing number and activities of NGOs and their gatherings indicate the nascent stage of the formation of global civil society, there are remarkable differences of thought among them, as among governments. This situation restricts obtaining universal consent on human rights issues. In this essay, the effect of NGOs on the human rights system is analyzed in detail. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essay Some human rights NGOs conduct in-depth global investigations into major planned crimes. For example, PPT is an international network of experts and social activists that thoroughly investigates crimes against humanity and renders judgment on this particular case. In this context, PPT investigates entire dimensions of international crimes through research and submitted evidence. Although the TPP has no legal authority to execute its judgment, these judgments appear more authentic to be concerned by the UN reference bodies due to the expertise and professional reputation of its panel. National NGOs play an important role in exposing human rights violations committed by the TPP. the majority state or communities in relation to the global community and, as a result, relations with states become hostile due to their activities. Nevertheless, the detailed study on human rights NGOs shows that citizen participation in human rights activities is increasing not only in industrialized democratic countries but also in less democratic and less democratic countries. industrialized due to links with global civil society. Most of the time, NGOs prioritize humanitarian issues that otherwise go unnoticed and bring in impartial experts to gather facts, figures and scientific arguments. During the massive anti-Muslim riots that took place in the Indian province of Gujarat in 2002, Human Right Watch participated in the extensive collection of evidence, fact-finding, and recommendations in a very hostile working environment and this publicity raised awareness of the vulnerability of Indian Muslims. and global pressure led to the prosecution of many of the perpetrators involved in the riot. This is the exact proof of how local NGOs could work effectively in putting humanitarian issues on the agenda. In whatconcerns third world countries, unlike first world countries, they started to decrease their human rights activities from 1970s, then non-governmental human rights activism is arrived. at the forefront of challenging state human rights abuses and disseminating global human rights standards adapted by the developed world. At the same time, the concerned states began to strengthen the concept of sovereignty under the guise of national integrity and security and therefore deliberately avoided such NGOs. While states have been almost trivialized in exercising sovereignty over people due to the consequences of rapid globalization, tensions between state sovereignty and NGOs have persisted for decades. From a philosophical point of view, sovereignty could be explained by authority, so authority is the right granted to the state by the people to impose order, the right to be obliged. But this not only comes with legitimate state power and rights, but they must also be put into practice. Furthermore, sovereignty can be classified as absolute and non-absolute depending on which state controls its affairs. Currently, almost all states do not have absolute sovereignty, but they have absolute sovereignty in matters of territorial law and order. This nature leads to the critical relationship between the state with legitimate authority in crime control and NGOs defending the human rights of prisoners, detainees and victims of extrajudicial trials. Amnesty International's Agenda is the perfect emulation for examining this tension. As Clark (1995) argues, because NGOs have a single issue agenda in their function, they are effective in achieving goals, while states have multiple functions with priorities determined by the national interest. Clearly, there is evidence that states retain their dominant role in the procedures and content of interactions on key sovereignty issues. This is why human rights NGOs like Amnesty International must deal with states on national security issues that are the highest priority. Nevertheless, it is now widely accepted that unless the sovereignty of a State implies, with its indispensable responsibility, that the State recognizes and guarantees fundamental rights. and the dignity of all citizens, the State has no ultimate power over its people. This concept provides moral justification for international communities and NGOs to intervene in state policies, particularly in human rights issues. Article 03 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) guarantees that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security. As Amnesty International (AI) takes on capital punishment around the world, its effectiveness becomes more questionable. Amnesty International has experienced experts and research and analysis capabilities on human rights violations. Additionally, AI is the authentic UN source. However, people in retentionist countries support the death penalty more than those in abolitionist countries. Sometimes human rights abuses against NGOs at the national level are presumed to be part of an international agenda to repress and isolate the state from the international community. The Sri Lankan government's attempts to suppress the independent operations of human rights organizations after the end of the civil war, under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2016, shows exactly what I mean in the previous paragraph.In these particular situations, the human rights work of NGOs may have adverse human rights consequences. According to the United Nations Charter of 1945 and the UDHR of 1948, it is recognized that women's rights are human rights. NGOs working in the field of women's rights have different influences on state policies and work mainly with national community organizations at the local level and INGOs. Clearly, public opinion influences the policymaking process on issues such as civil rights, government spending on defense, and economic policies. National NGOs help change public opinion on civil rights from a long-term perspective. Activists and relevant NGOs start with public education, awareness raising and on-the-ground research in national communities and empower women to forcefully demand their rights. When it comes to policy-making strategies, local actors partner with international communities through a wide network and tend to press governments to take favorable actions. This approach is most effective, especially in developing countries. The Sri Lanka Civil Society Collective (CCCS), which is a consortium of NGOs, has worked to alleviate discrimination against women in Sri Lanka at the grassroots level and submitted its reports to the Universal Periodic Review from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) along with their actionable recommendations. In this context, UNHCR's successful lobbying increased women's representation in decision-making by nominating 25 percent women candidates in local elections. The idea of ​​human rights can be considered either as a legitimate aspect or as a conviction for social movements. , but this crucial difference is only noticed by researchers. Many women's rights NGOs use both approaches, but the latter is more sustainable for spreading the idea broadly. It is unclear the influence of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) NGOs such as the International Lesbian and Gay Association. The demand for LGBT human rights was well established and possessed political opportunity in the European Union, but this approach did not work well in the UN due to opposition from many antagonistic states. NGOs have little influence in countries where religious fundamentalism is accepted by the state as a guiding principle. They have little access to raise public awareness in these states and the only strategy they follow is external pressure through UN bodies. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion In conclusion, as the essay shows, NGOs working on human rights issues have a positive influence with a significant extent in spreading human rights standards, revealing the state-led violations and community awareness. NGOs facing issues of state sovereignty and security face severe limitations in bringing about change and their influence often has negative effects on the community and increases state control over their activities. NGOs follow both internal and external strategies to bring about necessary changes in the human rights system, but their success depends on the application of an external strategy with the support of national communities through a program 2019,. 493-512.