blog
media download page
Essay / Unethical Bystander Effect Experiment suddenly you witness a distressing event unfold before your eyes. A person desperately needs help, but despite the crowds surrounding them, no one comes forward to help them. This phenomenon, known as the bystander effect, has captured the attention of psychologists and researchers for decades. However, the ethical implications of conducting bystander effect experiments have been the subject of heated debate. In this essay, we will explore why experiencing the bystander effect may be considered unethical. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Nature of the Experience To understand the ethical concerns surrounding the experience of the bystander effect, it is crucial to first look at the nature of the experience itself. In its simplest form, the experiment involves staging a situation in which an individual needs help and observing the audience's reaction. The goal is to study the diffusion of responsibility, a psychological phenomenon where individuals feel less inclined to help when others are present. Although this experiment provided valuable insights into human behavior, it raises ethical questions regarding the well-being and autonomy of the participants. Potential Harm to ParticipantsOne of the main ethical concerns of the bystander effect experiment is the potential harm to participants. In order to elicit a true response, experimenters often create scenarios that provoke stress, anxiety, and fear. Participants may believe they are witnessing a real emergency, leading to elevated heart rates, feelings of helplessness, and even trauma. It is crucial to consider the potential long-term psychological effects on participants subjected to such distressing situations. Emotional Manipulation Additionally, experiencing the bystander effect poses a risk of emotional manipulation. Experimenters intentionally create situations where the need for help is apparent, exploiting individuals' natural empathy and compassion. By manipulating these emotions, experimenters essentially coerce participants into action or inaction, raising ethical concerns about informed consent. Participants may feel obligated to act in a certain way due to the experimental context, rather than making a true decision based on their personal values and beliefs. Lack of debriefingIn addition to potential harm and emotional manipulation, lack of debriefing results in the bystander effect. experimentation is another ethical concern. Debriefing is a crucial stage of research, where participants are informed of the true nature of the study and given the opportunity to ask questions, express their feelings, and receive support if needed. However, in the experience of the bystander effect, participants are often unaware of the true purpose of the study and receive no follow-up support. This lack of debriefing not only considers the well-being of participants, but also fails to address any potential distress or confusion they may feel as a result of their involvement. Invasion of Privacy Additionally, experiencing the bystander effect can.
Navigation
« Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next »
Get In Touch