Table of ContentsIntroductionHistory and BackgroundConceptual Framework and Theoretical IdeasConclusionReferencesIntroductionPolitical violence is described as violence initiated using a politically motivated agenda with the help of the State and non-governmental organizations. state actors. Political violence is also defined as the use of force by a group of people with political motivations or goals. Political violence is defined as violence perpetrated by the government or the people in order to achieve political goals. It is described as the use of force and violence by the state against non-state actors or against another state. It includes a number of events such as protests, non-violent activities and conflict-based critical moments. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayThis essay seeks to explain political violence and its severity with the example of a case study of well-known revolutions and protests from history such as the Orange Revolution in Ukraine through the prism of the explanation of ideas and relevant framework according to the case study. To do this, it will first explain the context, history and reasons of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, then a detailed analysis will be carried out explaining the theoretical and conceptual framework that will help to understand the important points of the revolution. The Orange Revolution in Ukraine was a series of protests and political events from late November 2004 to January 2005. In 2004, during the presidential election, a political revolution occurred, claiming to be affected by electoral fraud and corruption with the pressure on people who voted for the opposition party.History and backgroundThere are series and events of demonstrations and protests against electoral fraud and voter intimidation in Ukraine with political corruption after the presidential elections that took place in 2004. According to Karatnycky's information and research, the initiators of this protest worked to declare fair elections. and free presidential elections. These goals were believed to have been achieved through strikes, civil resistance and civil disobedience throughout Ukraine. The lack of political and fraudulent elections as well as the lack of political and economic reforms caused a massive deployment of people, leading to protests and demonstrations during the revolution. Journalist Georgiy Gongadze allegedly targeted the government for corruption and unethical behavior of Ukrainian government politicians. Government authorities targeted Gongadze for exposing the corruption plaguing the country, while people supported Gongadze's case because they felt that the reason government authorities targeted Gongadze was so they could suppress his freedom of expression. of Gongadze caused public unrest with the murder and kidnapping of the journalist in September 2000. Additionally, the perception that Ukrainian authorities were behind Gongadze's murder and kidnapping, as well as the absence reforms based on political and economic concepts, caused discontent. of social and political selection in the post-Soviet era. People's dissatisfaction with their government and authorities gave rise to Viktor Yushchenko who challenged economic and political reforms with the opportunity to organize a resistance movement capable ofchallenge the elite of social and political society. According to Kuzio, the Internet was the basis of the Orange Revolution because it encourages revolution participants to be informed of developments during protests. A series of events occurred around this time. These events were described using focus groups, interviews and revolutions. He also analyzes the speeches given by opposition leaders. The events that took place from November 24 to December 3 were of great importance. Based on the protest negotiations and the stalemate between the opposition, the current government induced opposition leader Yanukovych to paralyze the government with nationwide strikes in Ukraine. Similarly, opposition leader Yanukovych was reluctant to make any concessions in favor of the government. Furthermore, the movement of security forces in the capital kyiv could have aggravated the situation, but the warning of secret services and military services throughout Ukraine prevented bloodshed. On December 3, the Supreme Court made the decision on the re-election of Viktor Yanukovych. and Viktor Yushchenko. The court ordered a second round of the election to be held, which should be repeated within three weeks, but President Kuchma and Yanukovych again preferred that the election go ahead as a whole. International reactions were seen, ranging from the President of the United States of America to that of the Russian Federation, and they agreed that fair and free elections should take place without any interference from other international forces that could affect the results elections. Conceptual framework and theoretical ideas The Orange Revolution was a unique event in Ukraine's history, but the outcome followed an example of democratic breakthroughs or "electoral revolutions" that had already occurred in Georgia in 2003, Serbia in 200, in Slovakia in 1998 and in Kyrgyzstan in 2005, as some will say. . These cases I mentioned all shared several characteristics: the catalyst for regime change was a corrupt national election; challengers to office holders sent extra-constitutional intentions to ensure that the conventional principles of political play in the constitution were respected; occupiers and challengers. claimed to hold sovereign authority over a similar region; these progressive circumstances ended without the massive use of violence by the state or the resistance; the end of these constituent insurrections triggered a critical leap in the level of democracy. Scholars have many theories of democratization. Seymour Martin Lipset's thoughts on modernization as a driver of democratization nevertheless deserve serious consideration, while other structuralist examinations have focused on related but particular factors, e.g. culture, economic imbalance, geology and resource endowments. Actor-centered scholars, who focus on the activities and communications of people and elites, specifically as a driver of democratization or its lack thereof, fight against these deterministic clarifications of democratization. Transitologists disagree on two questions: whether cooperation between parts of the old system and democratic challengers is important for democratic change and whether democratization should be seen as a game between elites, or whether societal and mass actors should be considered a parlor game. included in the analysis. The Orange Revolution offers strong evidence for individuals who,.131-145