blog




  • Essay / First American Constitution: Should the Constitution be ratified

    How well do you know the First American Constitution? The U.S. Constitution reflects a strong political voice that many citizens had not had for some time, thereby increasing the power of the government. Many states were developing their own constitutions, but American leaders felt the need for a stronger, more controllable government. So, should we ratify the Constitution? Many different factors, plans and actions have been developed to improve our government in many ways and make our nation whole. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The attempt to get a ratified constitution was a long process. Congress had to turn the constitution over to state legislators to decide whether they actually wanted to ratify it. There were two sides to the constitutional question: the Federalists, those who believed in a strong central government, and the Anti-Federalists, who suggested that their rivals were negative thinkers without their own agenda. Opposing each other, they both had good points on the Constitution; The Anti-Federalists' most compelling evidence was that the draft Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights, but the Federalists countered by arguing that the Constitution could preserve the Republican ideals of the Revolution far better than the Articles had done. The Federalists won and ratified ten states. Virginia being the last state to ratify. Although it took some time to do so, the Constitution was eventually ratified and it was now the Articles of Confederation that occurred prior to ratification. The Articles of Confederation were the main thing the government had before the constitution was fully created. The Articles consisted of a single legislative house, primarily composed of the wealthiest and most conservative men in a colony; it was created to bind the states together and give them the majority of governmental power. But these items were not the best thing for our country; they refused to give the central government the power to tax, they could not regulate commerce or start at the national level, the state would not send aid to the national government and congress had the power to make decisions but not to apply them. All these weaknesses caused the articles to collapse and led to the need for a new document. This new document called the Constitution of the United States was created because they regretted creating a national government so small that it could not deal with the problems faced both at home and abroad. At last the constitution was finally beginning to be put in order. The Constitutional Convention brought together delegates from eleven of the thirteen states, composed of lawyers, merchants, or planters, and many of them serving as officers in the Continental Army. The Constitutional Convention expected to make significant changes in the structure of government and was expected to freely make the many compromises that would require ample reasons to keep the deliberations secret. A big question within the convention was whether the articles should be revised or abandoned, which led to the first action plan called the Virginia Plan. Edmund Randolph proposed the existence of articles in Congress that called for a three-branch government: legislative, executive, and judicial to replace the Confederation Congress. This division of,?