In today's society, there is little more widespread and used than the Internet and its resources. The Internet offers a wealth of information and a considerable number of possibilities for communication and interaction. This wealth of information raises a number of questions regarding what should be available, what should be filtered, and how much control the government should have, if at all. This issue has been discussed by many people, with many solutions and different views on what should be implemented here in the United States. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get the original essay Net neutrality, according to Google, is the principle that Internet service providers must allow access to all content and applications, regardless of their source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. The term was originally coined by Tim Wu, a law professor, who explained net neutrality as giving the FCC the ability to shape "media policy, social policy, oversight of the political process, and issues of freedom of expression”. Previously, the Internet was a virtually unregulated private network system. The FCC and net neutrality advocates recognize that their ability to monitor and control speech broadcasters essentially allows them to control mass culture and politics. This tactic is used in many countries to control what information is available to the public. The Internet has never been "owned" or controlled by a single person or organization. Government control would defeat the purpose and reduce the trust of Internet sources and providers and, therefore, these regulations supporting Net Neutrality should not be implemented by the United States government. According to an article by Drew Armstrong on Net Neutrality, over the past 20 years, Internet privacy has been protected quite effectively by laws implemented by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). In March 2017, Congress voted 215-205 to eliminate internet privacy rules previously adopted by the FTC. The Senate also voted in this direction. The legislation was then signed by President Trump in April 2017. These new privacy laws were first passed under the Obama administration in 2015 by the FCC, whose goal was to regulate the Internet as if it were a public service. Current FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has emphasized that eliminating Internet regulations would not harm consumers or public interests because they were never really required but were put in place because of "ghosts brought up by people who wanted the FCC for political reasons to over-regulate the Internet” (Pai 1). The government's argument to essentially convert the Internet in the United States into a government entity is primarily aimed at "protecting" American citizens, which has a certain irony due to the fact that such censorship encroaches on one of our the most fundamental rights set out in the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment guarantees citizens the right to intellectual freedom and to hear all opinions on every issue in order to form their own informed opinions on different topics. The fact that the government claims to want to protect citizens by violating the rights guaranteed by the constitution seems counterintuitive and constitutes a violation of the rights promised by.