Most high school students don't wait until the end of their year because they feel exhausted from the seven long categories periods and not to mention boredom. John Taylor Gatto, former New York State Teacher of the Year, wrote an article known as “Against the School.” Gatto criticizes the university system for its inability to meet students' expectations and for the limitations of golf shots on their ability to have their say. The children feel neglected and therefore the teachers feel helpless as they have to work with the students and the organizations do not seem curious about the material given to them. Gatto mentions that the higher faculties of the United States suffered from their adaptation to the Prussian educational system. In accordance with Gatto, the purpose of high school is to control the minds of students to form a harmless and manageable society to learn government. This should not be the goal of colleges, but I think the author presents some real facts as to why the government would want this. Therefore, education should serve to help all students open their minds to the unknown, strengthen their skills, help them observe choices for their future lives, and encourage students' minds and hearts to discover new things. Gatto's recommendation for an improved education system is not to have a rigid establishment, but to facilitate students, an agency is in the low-level categories and update the teaching methods of teachers, so the government will not benefit not academics. the agency does poorly in the faculties. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayIn fact, the author points out this regarding the influence of James Bryant Conant within the university system (Gatto 36). Conant is responsible for the bulk of the Prussian educational system in most of the popular higher faculties, just like the months of university years, and therefore for the collective action of thousands of students who run a similar high school (Gatto 36). The Prussian system wanted to control a person's talents to favor the government, break the important thinking of students by involving their own commonplace to form a manageable society (Gatto 36). The standardized exam leaves World Health Organization students who failed to score decently on the test to be placed in low-level categories. He says the purpose of government is to put a group of individuals in charge of policing and dominating a society with low expectations, so that the government leads without being challenged or questioned. In this case, elders and scholars should work together to encourage every student to do their best not to let the government get their hands on their dreams and goals. Furthermore, he explains that we tend not to want compulsory establishment as high faculties to get a decent education. He mentioned that the presidents and scientists of the World Health Organization did not go to school, but were able to discover the simplest way to learn themselves (Gatto 35). They didn't follow a rigid establishment, but they managed to achieve bacon success. Once the man Thomas Edison started going to college, he was expelled because his professor considered him difficult to deal with. He was able to self-educate and became an excellent creator (Gatto 35). I think we tend to use the university system to benefit academics who might not be able to educate themselvesotherwise. Each student learns differently, as some students learn much more visually, others perceive modality, and others in an extremely proprioceptive way. For this reason, students should have the opportunity to interact in many categories to encourage them to be told and hopefully become superior students. Not to mention, Gatto points out that the $64,000 intended for the university system in his essay is having a dangerous impact on the life of a friend of mine. According to Gatto, “school is supposed to mark the unfit – with bad grades, remedial courses and various punishments”. As a related example, faculties allowed students with poor grades throughout the year to pass their grade only by attending the academic session. I actually have a lover whose dreams have been shattered because of the system we currently have. Andrea's eleventh grade was terribly difficult for her because her mother died at the start of the academic year. She struggled with depression, and once she entered the honors categories in the last three years, she began to struggle with her categories. Once she reached the twelfth grade due to her poor performance in her first year, she was placed in the middle level categories. She felt discouraged and someone did only what she needed to do to try to graduate. All of this resulted in her losing her chance to get a scholarship to a university she was attending forever. I would like to raise the academic standard of the university board and why always wait until you see them later to draw attention to a student's dangerous grades rather than warning your students at the beginning of their grades d 'failure ? The university system should target students like Andrea to provide them with messaging support to help them resolve their personal issues. Academics should work with foeys and people had specific students give them a warning sign to help them get off track as soon as the first failing grade comes. Additionally, the author points out that the school system prepares an inordinate group of scholars who performed poorly during their college years to perform work once they leave school (Gatto 37). The author reveals that “the school is supposed to determine the right social role of each student. This can be done by working with mathematical and anecdotal evidence on cumulative records” (Gatto 36). Additionally, researchers are harassed with recordings of their tests, which puts them at the lowest level of sophistication. These students leave school aimlessly, without the ability to seek employment or find employment that provides only occasional financial gain. They are ineffective in meeting the needs of a stable and decent job or in applying for a scholarship. Therefore, the college system should encourage and provide facilities to students who perform poorly and have a poor tutoring record. Considering these points, the college system should allow courses to involve students more in their learning method and apply new techniques with the aim of interacting with students so that they participate, study and concentrate at school. I completely understand that professors should follow a program within the category to enable their students to succeed. But student lectures might spend more time mentoring students as individuals than teaching an entire category. He thinks students should be.