In this short essay, I will analyze four crisis situations where the League of Nations showed its successes and failures. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get the original essay The first crisis situation is the conflict that arose due to Swedish nationalism/self-determination within the islands of Aaland while citizens wanted to be ruled by In Sweden, however, the two nations could not come to a decision, leading to the League of Nations making the decision. The League's response: The League decided to give the Aaland Islands to Finland on the condition that the islands remained demilitarized (most likely because the islands were between Finland and Sweden, thus giving Finland an advantage if it was to invade Sweden.) This was a response from the League. successful for the League of Nations because their goals were to prevent conflict, which they did because both nations had accepted the suggestion resulting in a diplomatic agreement. The second crisis situation called Upper Silesia (pro-German voters versus pro-Polish voters). After the First World War, citizens of Upper Silesia were given the opportunity to vote for the country they would like to be a part of. The votes were 700,000 for Germany and 500,000 for Poland. Due to these close numbers, communities were divided, leading to riots and conflict between the two parties. The League of Nations decided to separate Upper Silesia, with one half part of Germany and the other half part of Poland, allowing citizens to choose which region they wish to be part of. It was also a success because the League of Nations had prevented riots/conflicts from escalating in Upper Silesia and had also reached a diplomatic agreement between Germany, Poland and the citizens of Upper Silesia. The third crisis situation is the Corfu incident (Italy against Greece). Following a border dispute between Italy and Greece, Italy had sent the Italian general Enrico Tellini. Unfortunately, a Greek nationalist group attacked the general and his men, resulting in their deaths. The killing of the military general and his men led Italy to send an ultimatum to Greece, which included a formal apology, a dignified funeral for the men in Athens, prosecution of those responsible and compensation of 50 million pounds. Greece had responded and accepted the requests, but with modifications. Unfortunately, Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini believes that Greece should have accepted without any negotiations. As a result, Italy sent part of its navy to attack and occupy the island of Corfu. This led Greece to appeal to the League of Nations. What was not expected was that Italy would rather leave the league than allow it to resolve the problem. Because he wanted the conference of ambassadors to deal with the situation. The Conference of Ambassadors had to propose new conditions to settle the dispute and informed Italy, Greece and the League of Nations. Italy and Greece then agreed to the terms. It was a failure for the League, because it was not them who led the negotiations, it was the Conference of Ambassadors who convinced the League of the terms because if the League got involved, Italy would leave the League, which could lead to conflict/war. The last crisis situation was that of the Mosul province (1924) (Great Britain against Türkiye against Iraq). After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, there was a dispute between Britain (which at the time occupied) and Turkey,..