As hydraulic fracturing is still generally new, it also has fewer laws governing the procedure. This is a question of procedural fairness from several points of view. Influenced people are denied honest data from organizations about what is really happening. When entering into conflict with any of the organizations, those influenced are at a reasonable disadvantage due to lack of learning and lack of money. A large portion of the general population simply does not have the money to carry out the procedure. Without administrative laws on fracking, the organizations enjoy a privileged position on the grounds that the shameful acts they commit are not considered illegal. Fairness of recognition is also another issue that bothers influenced individuals. Organizations and government tend not to see the circumstances people find themselves in influenced and similarly claim that water and air are completely protected. Influenced people who attempted to engage in the procedural process would be content with the fact that it cost less in the long run. The individuals who settled were not allowed to say anything about the organizations, abandoning them with even less recognition. Reckless laws passed by the legislature and deep pockets of organizations that joined in have exacerbated the problems and left the influenced in disgusting conditions. An endless loop was created where lack of recognition led to problems in the procedural process, and problems in the procedural process caused takeovers which resulted in even less recognition. Even if the influenced people have signed a lease allowing the organizations to use their territory, unresolved issues must be resolved. Until new laws are put in place to impose more regulations and burdens on organizations, these shameful acts will persist..