Namit Arora's On Eating Animals discusses carnivore diets and modern factory settings. The article first tells the story of a cow that escaped far from the treacherous factory, then details how farms changed over time. What was once an efficient and patient business is now a profitable and impatient business. Profits trump safety and humane conditions in the meat industry. The animals are left in unbearable conditions and fed chemicals to encourage rapid growth. Money should certainly not be the only goal of such factory farming. Animals deserve rights because it has been proven that they too can feel pain like humans. The author explores several sub-themes and realities of this sector as well as public opinion (Arora, 2013). Through the use of logos, pathos and ethos, the author provides sufficient evidence of animal cruelty. Arora is not anti-meat, but rather anti-cruelty. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The purpose of this essay is to present the cruelties that animals face before slaughter. The author wants the audience to realize what harm animals have to go through before being served on their plates. The author's position is serious and informative. She's definitely not against eating meat, as she never claims that in the article. However, she doesn't think the current method of farming is justified. The tone of this article also has elements of seriousness and relaxation. At the beginning, we use a story which, to a certain extent, is quite humorous. However, the relaxed setting certainly goes downhill towards the end. The rest of the essay takes place in a more serious and sad tone than the initial piece. In my opinion, the target audience for this selection includes meat eaters. I say this because those who do not consume meat products certainly know this information. However, I'm sure vegetarians as well as carnivores can learn a fact or two from this story. The author uses the rhetorical devices of logos, pathos, and ethos in this article to help prove his points. Logos refers to logic. This is demonstrated when the author discusses the facts to highlight the situations of escaped animals. At the beginning of this essay, Arora explains how six cows escaped at the same time and the punishments they suffered for this. According to Arora (2013): “A few years ago in Omaha, six cows escaped at once. Five were quickly recaptured; one kept running until Omaha police cornered her in an alley and shot her. The cow, screaming miserably and limping like a drunk for several seconds before collapsing, died in the street in a pool of blood” (Arora, p.1, 2013). We can say that this example is factual in nature because many people have reported witnessing it. This logical appeal reveals to the audience the cruelty that animals face. Facts are essential to the credibility of articles, especially ones like this one. The public will not respond well to articles on topics like this without the use of facts. Mainly because no one wants to admit support for such corrupt and inhumane practices. The author also uses the rhetorical device of pathos in this article. Pathos is a call made by emotion. The author amplified these strategies by mentioning “animal lovers”.