In many religions, the use of clothing such as the Jewish yarmulke or Islamic hijab is worn not simply out of choice, but out of strict ritual or religious obligation. For religious groups, wearing traditional clothing is not only considered a religious duty, but is also closely linked to spiritual practice and provides a sense of spiritual identity. Its widespread use shows that it has become an integral part of the continuity of multiple religious practices. To the extent that the wearing of religious clothing is based on the manifestation of central religious beliefs (SOURCE), to what extent can a state hinder this expression of freedom? Should we approach this conflict as a question of individual sovereignty or should we adopt a global standard? Technically speaking, the right to express religious freedom without government influence is enshrined in sovereign treaties, doctrines, and constitutions around the world. It is also addressed globally, notably in the Declaration of Human Rights (SOURCE). However, this issue would not require discussion and improvement if there were no exceptions. Although the general idea is that it is a fundamental human right and there should be absolutely no reservations about religious expression, there are certain issues in which religion must be considered beyond interests of national security and individual security. Military soldiers must understand that certain priorities, such as unit cohesion, security and uniformity, must take precedence when facing conflicts in different environments. The freedom to express one's religion and tradition through clothing is not a universal right and is subject to relativism depending on the current situation and perspective.Paragraph: Fundamental human right to tradition.... .. middle of paper ...... cultural differences and environments around the world. Complete universalism cannot be applied in the case of the army. The influence of relativism can harm human rights, but it is acceptable if used for the right reasons. When it comes to national safety and security, relativism can and should apply to the rights of those sworn to protect them. Regarding the display of religion through traditional clothing, civilian people should enjoy this right universally, while national security forces and the active military should be restricted. Civilians have the privilege and duty to display their culture and religion in an effort to achieve universal acceptance of religious freedom. But before this can happen, in the tense environment of the battlefield, soldiers must first show dedication to the people and restrict religious clothing keeping the bigger picture in mind..