blog




  • Essay / The role of peer feedback in improving writing

    With reference to the literature, Nicole et al. (2013) state that “students often perceive the feedback they receive from peers as more understandable and useful than feedback from teachers because it is written in more accessible language.” Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayTo what extent do you agree?What do you think are the benefits of peer feedback on learning, respectively on the improvement of students' writing?Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of PhilologyNovember 14, 2017Peer feedback consists of helping students to improve by commenting on each other's work (Nicole, Thomson and Breslin, 2013). This contrasts the traditional teacher method with the student feedback method. In contemporary times, the peer feedback method is becoming a commonly used method. Undoubtedly, accessible language makes peer feedback practical and the benefits of peer feedback in writing range from syntax, word order to the overall idea and meaning of the work. Learning a foreign language is a difficult enough task in itself, so having people help you achieve it. throughout the process is a significant advantage. Working with your peers is essential to the process because you will have more or less the same level of knowledge in the target language. Asking someone with advanced English proficiency to provide feedback has not been shown to be more effective than feedback received from people with the same level of English (Li, Liu, & Steckelberg, 2010). As Li et al (2010) suggest, it is easy to understand that when it comes to how students feel about the feedback they receive on their work, it is easier to understand someone who has to work on the same writing task. Having the same issues in mind and not having an established gap in L2 language proficiency allows us as students to improve effectively by working closely with each other. This provides significant support for the idea that accessible language provides an easier route to incorporating peer feedback. Feedback given by peers was used to improve the writing of subsequent versions of the work at both levels, local aspects of syntax, word order as well as the general idea and meaning of the work (Altsteadter, 2016). . Globally, peer reviews appear to prove its value in being more accessible. Some elements of grammar were improved through peer feedback and these improvements resulted from accessible language (Berggren, 2014). This finding is not the only one to support the idea that accessibility makes peer feedback more relevant to further improve each other's work. Such claims can also be seen in Min (2006), Rahimi (2013) and Zhao (2010). As Yang (2015) shows, students were able to identify their weak areas in writing and work on them more effectively after reviewing their peers' feedback. Additionally, most comments during peer feedback sessions focused on areas regarding writing such as grammar, word order, and lexicography (Yang, 2015). Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. .Get a Custom EssayReading other works allows me to come into contact with different sentence structures, 15, 3-17.