blog




  • Essay / Statements Supporting Saluda's Health Claims for Bottled Water

    The article regarding Saluda Drinking Water appears in a health and fitness magazine. The article includes several hypotheses that involve tap water and bottled water. Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains many of the minerals associated with good health and is completely bacteria-free. Saluda residents are hospitalized less frequently than the national average, which in this case is assumed to be because more people drink bottled water rather than tap water. Although the article gives various reasons why it is beneficial to drink bottled water, they are not valid as there are many other salutations to their hypotheses which I will explain in the following text. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There are many answers to the article's assumptions but are not listed because the city is trying to promote a healthy lifestyle as well as their bottled water. First, the article mentions that Saluda residents are hospitalized less frequently, which does not prove that this is due to bottled water consumption. In other words, the explanation for this situation may have nothing to do with water in general, but with the fact that these are generally healthy people. Another hypothesis put forward was that tap water is not necessarily "bad" for you, but that bottled water is healthier for your well-being. In this case, they are simply trying to promote bottled water because even though laboratory studies show it to be healthier, there is no direct evidence to conclude that tap water is unhealthy. As a result, it doesn't mention anything about other water bottle brands; so it's assumed that everyone drinks this type of drink, not to mention why everyone is healthier. Additionally, there might be several other brands (e.g. Aquafina, Pure Life, Dasani, Natural Springs, etc.) that are close, if not better than the so-called "leading brand" that everyone drinks. Throughout the article, based on the information provided, several elements and reasoning behind their "facts" are missing. Although it provided a laboratory study, no evidence was provided linking bottled water to healthier people. While it may contain several beneficial minerals and be free of bacteria, this can also have a negative outcome, as bottled water is the main cause of pollution, which later ends up being the air that we breathe, which could potentially put us in danger. To support this theory, research has proven that more than 80% of recyclable plastic bottles end up in landfills each year. They do not break down naturally and release toxic chemicals when they eventually break down. Other reasons why tap water is more beneficial than bottled water are: it is healthier for our environment, tap water is frequently tested for bacteria such as E.coli and cryptosporidium and other harmful contaminants, tap water is just as tested. like bottled water etc. As previously stated in the paragraph above, the author failed to support or address additional information with supporting evidence. There are several missing components and missing hardware that could have made the item better..