blog




  • Essay / Sexuality The Oedipus complex and social constructionist theory

    Freud's perspective on sexuality, unlike other approaches, focuses on the sexual orientation of the child. He distinguished the child who suckled his mother's breast as the first form of infantile eroticism. The Oedipus complex contributes enormously to Freud's argument on sexuality. This suggests that the child becomes unconsciously sexually attached to his mother and hostile to his father. However, the Oedipus complex does not take into account female sexuality. This only forces the rivalry between the young boy and his father as well as the competition between father and son for the mother's love. Eventually, the baby understands that the father is more dominant and aspires to be like him. As it centers on the little boy and his attention to his mother, Freud's Oedipus complex is criticized by many feminists. Overall, Freud's perspective on sexuality focuses on the sexual nature of the child. It mentions the hatred the child has for the parent of the same sex and the love he has for the parent of the opposite sex. But the Oedipus complex does not take into account female sexuality and is therefore criticized by many feminists. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on 'Why violent video games should not be banned'? Get an original essay Social constructionist theory, when referring to sexuality and identity, suggests that categories, e.g. 'heterosexual » and “homosexual”, have finally become central to our understanding. sexuality. When asked about your sexuality, someone's sexual orientation automatically becomes relevant. Sexuality is not only about a person's emotional and sexual attraction to a particular gender, it can also refer to the ability of humans to engage in sexually stimulating experiences and sexuality can be expressed in many ways , for example through behaviors or fantasies. The purpose of sexuality goes beyond reproduction. It is also about how we receive pleasure from our own bodies: “Sex life includes the function of obtaining pleasure from areas of the body, a function which is then put to the service of reproduction. Often the two functions do not completely coincide.” This reinforces the idea that sexuality goes beyond reproduction. Furthermore, the social constructionist view of sexuality moves away from the debate on the biological bases of sexual desire. Rather, it highlights that all societal labels and the meanings attached to them are found in a particular sociocultural and historical context. They are socially constructed; they are human creations. Foucault argues that sexuality is classified and understood in our culture as more than just sexual acts and practices, but as a disposition, an identity. It's who we are, not just what we do. “Sexual meanings, sexual doctrines, and sexual beings have been endlessly generated by a culture that has become obsessed with the meaning of the sexual and elevated it to unprecedented dimensions. This further reinforces Foucault's argument that sexuality is classified and understood in our culture as more than just sexual acts, but as an integral part of our identity. It is mentioned that “homosexuality appeared as one of the forms of sexuality when it was transposed from the practice of sodomy into a hermaphroditism of the soul. The sodomite had been a temporary aberration; the homosexual was a species. He mentions the influence of major institutions, such as religion, family, law, on the identity of a.