According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2012), “An inductive logic is an evidential support system that extends deductive logic to less than certain inferences ….in a good inductive argument, the premises must provide some degree of support for the conclusion, where such support means that the truth of the premises indicates with some degree of strength that the conclusion is true. » When we examine Fisher's speech, we can find inductive reasoning. For example, at the beginning of her speech, she introduces the fact about HIV/AIDS with specific examples; “The reality of AIDS is extremely clear. Two hundred thousand Americans are dead or dying; a million more are infected. Worldwide, there will be forty, sixty or one hundred million infections in the coming years” (Fisher, 1992). As this sentence shows, it demonstrates a specific number of people who will suffer from HIV/AIDS. After this sentence, she warns that everyone is susceptible to HIV/AIDS. She mentions: “It’s not a distant threat. This is a current danger. The infection rate is increasing most rapidly among women and children” (Fisher, 1992). She then describes that it is important to learn from Fisher's lesson and speaks about HIV/AIDS to future generations in conclusion: "Learn with me the lessons of history and grace, so that my children will not Don't be afraid to say the word “AIDS”. when I'm gone. So their children and yours may not need to whisper it at all” (Fisher, 1992). I consider this structure of Fisher's speech to be inductive reasoning. At the beginning of her speech, she uses specific examples and shows that a number of people have AIDS/HIV. Additionally, following her speech, she mentions that everyone has the potential to be infected with HIV/AIDS due to the number of people infected. Ultimately, she describes the importance of telling children and