IntroductionDisputes and conflicts are mainly caused by race, gender, culture, language, ideologies and religion. These factors are interrelated because they show the differences between people in all ways that cause disputes, debates and misunderstandings on an international or local level. Many periods of debate and debate between who is dominant and who is subordinate have been a great contribution to the construction of our history which, until now, continues to be added to. Disputes and conflicts in this era only repeat history, history speaks for itself. . Since the study of anthropology studies humanity either on a cultural level, on past societies, physical or linguistic; it studies how and why society was formed as it is today. One of the most interesting areas of anthropology is linguistic anthropology, because we know that language influences our social lives. Furthermore, it also explores how language shapes people's communication and how it organizes cultural beliefs and ideologies. Fifty years ago, the study of cultural conflict for anthropologists was limited to people living in close proximity to each other (Beeman, 2008). Previously, anthropologists mainly studied factions living in the same society and limited themselves to conflict and violence within the country and not between countries. However, anthropologists today study conflicts between nations based on their studies of conflicts within the nation. Knowledge and understanding of history will help to understand why certain disputes and conflicts persist. .... middle of paper ...... unite to fight for their common goal. The conflict between the United States and the Middle East is due to a misunderstanding of the objectives of the other parties. Conflicts and disputes do not only occur between two nations, but also within a country. Different races and ethnicities are the reason why individuals within the same society have conflict – as well as misunderstandings with what each race and background wants. Monoglot standardization is not an easy solution to implement because it would create more misunderstandings between races. If interpreters can understand and respond to a verbal duel when most words have a double meaning, then it is also possible to understand the language and meaning of races different from others. This will happen if people learn to listen and not just hear..