Where morality as we understand it in modern society is widely interpreted through many schools of thought which each go into different details. Although many perspectives have moderate validity, I believe that evolutionary scientists, psychologists, and philosophers have the most credible and provable theory for how we think about morality. They see it as how we have evolved higher thought processes and social awareness over billions of years. Additionally, it is thought to explain the way we react and judge why things are as good or as bad as we think they are. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayPsychologists and scientists have conducted research and experiments on observing animals and humans, and what they What most animals with smaller brains notice, or more accurately what they don't notice, is that they tend not to make good moral decisions when faced with a dilemma like this is the case with larger-brained mammals like chimpanzees and humans. This is because in their branch of evolution, their genes have not been mutated as much from generation to generation of their species. The animal brain only appeared 250 million years ago. The human brain or "real" brain (the most modern adaptation) only evolved to its current sophistication 200,000 years ago and has not changed much since. Along with the evolution of the sophistication of our brains have come evolutions in our ability to distinguish our emotions, our increased capacity to learn and adapt, and to determine which actions lead to more or less pleasant outcomes. Our social skills have also improved, probably due to climate change and the scarcity of fruits and vegetables. Humans had to learn to come together to hunt larger game for meat. The rules that followed began as a way for many people to get along without struggle. Although through many millennia of socialization and the creation of our modern societies, we prefer to think of our rules as morality based on how we feel. As individuals, we label things as good or bad based on our emotional response to the act we are judging. We have the initial emotional reaction (whether we liked or hated what happened) to the action, and then we try to give a reason for that action. emotion. For example, if we simply found out that our close friend's significant other cheated on them, we would have a knee-jerk reaction of anger or sadness that would make our lives even worse. We decided it was a bad thing before we thought about any logic or reasoning. Then we say that cheating is wrong for specific reasons. A conscience is just a collection of all the biased actions we have experienced or heard about, and we use our conscience to apply what we have already learned from similar past instances to any action that occurs. will then produce. Our minds go through this whole process so quickly that some tend to think that we innately know what is right and wrong when we do not know objectively in all circumstances. We only know our feelings about a situation and the reasoning we apply to those feelings. It is then logical to believe that our conscience or our moral sense changes over time. That.