blog




  • Essay / Arther Miller's use of literary techniques in The Crucible

    Arther Miller, The Crucible has sparked many ideas in people's minds and talks about topics that were unheard of at the time. Miller wanted to give an idea of ​​how one lie after another can escalate into a chain reaction creating anarchy throughout the village. The Crucible tells the story of a village that faced a great loss of population due to the desire of a young woman (Abigail) to have a man married to someone else, taking advantage of the system broken Puritan-Christian government that thought witches existed. The story repeated frightening language, with nervous characters wondering whether they would be accused by the accused girls of witchcraft and whether they would be hanged by the court magistrate sent to investigate the crime. Irony was used to show how a faction of the town's population was actually adept at the poor choices people made. The story also contained the use of hyperbole statements showing how the characters reacted to the events happening around them and how what they said, no matter how insignificant, caused a butterfly effect. Abigail Williams, the antagonist behind all this, has resorted to political manipulation on the ground to get what she wants, killing everyone in her path. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned"? Get the original essay Miller's message of unsettling escalation is conveyed through the use of chilling diction to describe the manipulation of the village, which expanded the lie and the problem. In Act I, Betty pretended to be sick while Mary accused Abigail of her wrongdoings in the forest. Now angered, Abigail retaliates, declaring that if they "breath a word, or the shadow of a word, about other things, and she will come to them in the dark of a terrible night, and she will bring a reckoning sharp which will make you shudder. This means that Abigail threatens Betty and Mary with a blade so that they will report this slander to Parris, instead of telling the truth about what happened in the forest. This justifies the problem because Abigail uses fear to manipulate the girls into doing what they want, thus creating the problem that continues throughout the story. In Act III, the trial against the witchcraft charge, John told Mary Warren to testify by presenting her evidence against the lying girls. In Act III, during the presentation of her testimony, the girls pretended to be hurt and possessed by Mary's soul, with Abigail imitating "She can't see anything", then Mary pleading "Abby, you mustn't don’t,” to which all the girls responded with “Abby, you shouldn’t.” you shouldn't! This describes the event in which Abigail and the rest of the girls turn on Mary, making her feel helpless by claiming she possessed their souls. Abigail's manipulation is an example of fearful diction in the Crucible, shaping the context of the severity of the problem. Arthur Miller uses irony throughout the play to explain how one lie after another can escalate into a chain reaction. This shaped the way villagers viewed each other in the face of the developing problem. In Act 1, Abigail Willians tells Hale and Parris that Tituba forced her to drink blood. “She made me do it!” She made Betty do it! She makes me drink blood! This quote shows how one lie can lead to another, because because Abigail lies about what really happened in the woods, and it's a big lie, not a small one, the girls feel like they can make/40464241)