A tyrant is someone who does not take fairness into account. His decisions are primarily based on self-righteousness rather than the well-being of others. The protagonist Macbeth, whom Shakespeare describes as a “valiant cousin,” experiences different phases of respectability, all shaped by his inevitable fate. As an audience, we interpret and form an opinion through Shakespeare's use of psychological manipulation of the audience. Throughout the beginning of the play, we are led to believe that this is a "noble warrior", a man loyal to his administrator who represents that of the divine Duncan. Her metamorphosis all began with the confrontation with the “rebel sisters”. This was an inevitable "accident of life", which would have serious repercussions on Macbeth's future role, because "what is right is wrong and what is wrong is right", implying that under every human hides the potential to be one or the other. Although the stories are based on tyrants and their ability to gain power and pride through the scarification of others, I believe the authors also attempted to depict the tyrants' need to feel praised and to express their passion and anger . Their determination to achieve what is most important to them is why both tyrants were able to achieve absolute power, at different times under their control. Macbeth's form of government was tyrannical in terms of how he reached the pinnacle of power that he achieved. after killing King Duncan. His complete disregard for anything that influenced his life in a negative way led him to kill his own men and friends. As a result, he spent more time covering his tracks than ruling a prosperous kingdom. “But Banquo’s is safe? »… with twenty cuts on the head; It’s dead to nature, to say the least. This quote supports the state...... middle of paper ...... at the time' In this quote, Squealer lies to the animals about Snowball, in order to gain control of their minds. Macbeth didn't lay a very good foundation to cover his tracks and as a result his kingdom and people rebelled against him. I think the authors intended to create tyrannical characters, but they wanted to express their tyrannical properties in unique forms in both stories. Orwell describes corrupt leadership as the flow of revolution rather than the act of revolution itself. While Shakespeare describes corrupt leadership as a rule of chaos. The two tyrants' methods of inflicting injustice are what make them equally the same and at the same time also different. Macbeth and Napoleon should be respected, regardless of their tyrannical rule, because their ability to achieve full power and control is remarkably admirable..