In general, people who lean left support all types of stem cell research, including the rather controversial and stigmatized embryonic stem cell research. This sometimes involves creating and destroying embryos or unborn offspring at early stages of development, in order to harvest stem cells. Although stem cell research is a relatively new frontier in the world of medicine, it has already led to significant advances within the industry. Stem cells are capable of transforming into other cell types and have the potential to regenerate tissues over time, which could eventually lead to life-changing treatments for a variety of medical conditions. Embryonic stem cells are superior to others because they have the ability to transform into ANY cell type, not just a selected few. The left argues that this invaluable scientific knowledge outweighs the ethical dilemma of recovering stem cells from human embryos (some might consider the embryo a human being with a full right to life). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Congress has been interested in stem cell research since the 1970s. In the early days of this policy, the majority of actions favored the right-wing position and therefore placed restrictions on stem cell research. stem cells, particularly embryonic. Despite these limitations, private researchers have continued to work with embryonic stem cells with great success. In 1995, President Clinton banned federal funding of research on embryos created for the sole purpose of experimentation, but allowed funding of research on embryos left behind by fertility clinics. During the Bush administration, several attempts were made to increase federal funding, but President Bush vetoed every one. In 2009, however, the left made progress when President Obama reversed many of the restrictions Bush put in place during his term. Of course, opposition ensued and a lawsuit was filed against the federal funding increase, but it was overturned by the United States Court of Appeals. This game of legislative etiquette still persists today. The left's position on this issue is an excellent example of its rationalist values. They avoid referring to religious notions and instead rely strictly on secular scientific justification. For example, John Kerry demonstrated rationalism when speaking about stem cell research at the 2004 Democratic National Convention: “What if we had a president who believed in science so that we could unleash the wonders of discovery? , such as stem cell research to treat disease and save millions of people? of lives? Egalitarianism is also evident in their support of stem cell research, as they seek to help their fellow human beings by encouraging research that could lead to revolutionary discoveries that could cure a multitude of diseases. Additionally, their hope to lead the world in this research and share their progress with other countries demonstrates a certain degree of internationalism. Democrats also want to avoid falling behind in this race for science and will therefore not hesitate to make quick policy decisions. Although some maythinking that science and government should not be linked (because it could create a conflict of interest), Democrats believe it is a necessary partnership if the country is to make progress in the areas of medicine, technology, etc. Their mindset is that they need our help and we need their help, so it's a mutually beneficial relationship. Finally, Democrats have also proposed making stem cell donation an option for women in abortion clinics, demonstrating the importance they place on individual freedoms and the right to control one's own body. cellular search but supports other types. The most common reason for their opposition concerns morality, as they believe it is their duty to protect the well-being of all life, including embryos. For example, Republican Jeb Bush, among many other conservatives, has said that using embryos for research is a form of disrespect for life. They are particularly upset by the idea of ​​creating human embryos in a laboratory to experiment on and ultimately destroy them. In their eyes, it is essentially about using human life as a means to an end. Another concern about this research is that it could lead to more dehumanizing practices and institutions. The early 2000s saw the most political action on this issue, with the right leading the way. In 2001, President Bush made the major decision to halt funding for most embryonic stem cell research. This policy did not affect private or publicly funded research. Bush continued to maintain this policy for the remainder of his term. However, there have been several close calls. In 2005, President Bush used his veto for the first time to overturn the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act, which passed Congress with strong bipartisan support. However, Congress was undeterred and attempted to pass a similar law in 2007, but again, Bush immediately vetoed it. These vetoes mark the end of all activity on the part of the Bush administration. Earlier this year, President Trump announced that National Institutes of Health (NIH) employees could no longer conduct research on human fetal tissue and that university researchers seeking grants would face new restrictions. This is the most recent political effort, and so it is the right that is currently winning in this debate. Without a doubt, faith is the most influential factor behind conservative logic on this issue. Since the right largely follows a Christian or Catholic denomination, their argument emphasizes the importance and dignity of human life, which the Bible says begins at conception. Therefore, most people on the right are strongly opposed to research aimed at obtaining stem cells from human embryos. Not only do traditional religious texts heavily influence the right's decision-making, but so do modern-day religious leaders. In an international speech in 2006, Pope Benedict XVI said: "The destruction of human embryos to harvest stem cells is not only devoid of the light of God, but also devoid of humanity and does not truly serve the humanity. » Simply put, both left and right agree that human life must be respected and disease cured; they simply disagree about where human life begins. The right's point of view also reflects its..