blog




  • Essay / Analysis of Orwell's "Politics and the English Language"

    The content of Orwell's thesis indicates that political language waters down our own English language, and when this happens, language takes away the depth and quality of your personal thoughts. significant decline in overall communication skills as well as intelligence.Say no to plagiarismGet a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayBrief Analysis of “Politics and Language English” by Orwell in his work. essay, Orwell catalogs some of the most important vices. Dying Metaphors: A metaphor is hackneyed and has many definitions that define it. It is generally used when the author takes over the knowledge and understanding of the metaphor, alternately thinking about his own metaphor. Often they can also be a production of the past and be incorporated inappropriately. Operators or false members: There are phrases that replace “proper” nouns and/or verbs, those that are described as having. egalitarianism to the best selected words.Pretentious diction: countless words used to emphasize an opinion and/or prejudice, toning it up, seem unaffiliated, impartial and completely analytical. Meaningless words are normally generalized words that contain limited and restricted value, respecting the topic being discussed. What are the six fundamental questions a scrupulous writer should ask himself? What am I trying to say? What words will express it? Could I put it more briefly? Which image will make it clearer? this image fresh enough to have an effect? Did I say something that was unavoidably strange? Orwell is particularly concerned with the power of language when it comes to political writing. Find a quote that you think best explains this concern. “I have not here considered the literary use of language, but simply language as an instrument of expression and not of concealment or prevention of thought. Stuart Chase and others came close to claiming that all abstract words are meaningless and used this as an excuse to advocate a kind of political quietism. Since you don't know what fascism is, how can you fight against fascism? There is no need to swallow such nonsense, but it must be recognized that the current political chaos is linked to the decline of language and that some improvement can probably be made starting with the verbal end. » There are six basic rules. which, according to Orwell, will prevent bad writing: Do not use metaphor, simile, or any other common figure of speech in writing. Don't use long words where you can use short words instead. If cutting a word is possible, then be sure to do so. Always use the active voice when you can rather than the passive voice. Avoid using a foreign expression, scientific word, or jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. Break one of these rules. rather than saying something downright barbaric. In my opinion, the most important rules would be numbers 3 and 6. By not following rule 3, the reader will end up straying from the points described. Likewise, rule 6 is a very strict rule, because saying barbaric things will not only discredit the writer and his argument, but also delegitimize it. Orwell discusses language, not in terms of literature, but in terms of politics. In a well-developed paragraph, explain your opinion on the issue of language and power. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized item now.