“No knowledge can be produced by a single way of knowing”Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay When we refer to reason as a way of knowing, it makes me think about how it allows our thoughts, decisions, and judgments to be supported, if not created, by logic. In this essay, I will discuss the importance of reason and other ways of knowing in different areas of knowledge. On the one hand, reason is a reliable way of knowing because I believe it allows us to clearly state or explain what is happening around us. while emotion can block our vision of perceiving things or people. In fact, because of emotions, reason can become blurred, as for example when a victim of sexual abuse needs to identify their abuser; she could obtain any information that might lead her to give a particular/desired answer, as opposed to a necessarily precise answer. However, if the woman is not particularly misled by questions that might affect her memory or overwhelm her emotionally with the horrible memories of what happened, her logic kicks in by giving clear and concise answers. Maybe this will save the court from sending the wrong defendant to prison. Additionally, by referring to a real-life situation showing how reason is a reliable way of knowing, I could relate this to mathematics and how our deductive logic helps us in this area. awareness. For example, if we take into account the mathematical system of Euclidean geometry; this states that “The angle of a straight line is 180 degrees”. The premises could therefore be: if we have a line C and another line D which crosses C such that it creates two angles x and y. Let's say angle x is equal to 39º. How big would angle y be? Based on the information we have and the ruler, we can deduce that the angle will be: 180º - 39º = 141º. On the other hand, reason is not a reliable way to know because I think it can lead to very weak deductions. This could be related to analogical reasoning/argumentation and how it prevents us from seeing beyond the surfaces most of the time. Say a person doesn't like shrimp; so the same person will think that they won't like oysters either because both are shellfish. Additionally, by relating them to a real-life situation, I want to trace philosopher Thomas Reid's 1785 argument for the existence of life on other planets. Here there could be a connection to natural science since Reid noted many similarities between Earth and the other planets in our solar system. He stated that all orbits are illuminated by the sun, several have moons, and all rotate on an axis. Therefore, he concludes, it is "not unreasonable to think that these planets may, like our Earth, be the habitation of various orders of living creatures." Most of the time, this type of reasoning can be the most practical form of justifying a hypothesis. Also, regarding the statement "No knowledge can be produced by just one way of knowing", I think this might be true. For example, based on natural sciences, we can take into account the Northern Lights or the Northern Lights. This phenomenon occurs when charged particles from the magnetosphere collide with atoms in Earth's upper atmosphere, they absorb additional energy which is expressed as light. When.