Miranda v. Arizona was one of the most important cases of the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that before a police interrogation, a criminal suspect in custody must be informed of his constitutional rights addressed in the 6th Amendment : the right to remain silent and the 5th Amendment, anything the suspect says can and will be used against him in court, the right to an attorney, and if the suspect cannot afford an attorney, one will be named to them. There is no denying the importance of Miranda Rights and this case discussed in the essay. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for rape, kidnapping, and robbery. He was taken to the Phoenix, Arizona police station, where officers placed Miranda in a lineup with 3 other men, but the woman he had kidnapped and assaulted, 18-year-old Lois Ann Jameson, did not could not positively identify it as her. attacker. Miranda was then interrogated for two hours. During his interrogation, Miranda allegedly confessed to committing all the crimes against him while being recorded. However, he was not informed of his rights to remain silent and to have a lawyer. When Miranda's case came to court, the prosecution's only evidence was the confession recorded during her interrogation, which was upheld by the court. Ernesto Miranda was later convicted of all charges and sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison. After his conviction, Miranda appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, and in 1965 the state Supreme Court agreed with the Superior Court's decision. Miranda was convicted of her crimes. In 1966, the United States Supreme Court overturned Mr. Miranda's conviction and ordered that the state of Arizona give him a new trial. Subsequently, Miranda appealed to the United States Supreme Court, where the case granted him Certiorari, an order by which a higher court reviews a lower court's decision. The case was argued before the Supreme Court for three days beginning on February 28 and concluded on March 2, 1966. On June 13, 1966, the United States Supreme Court decided to overturn the decision made by the State Court. The Supreme Court also ruled that day that suspects' rights must be explained to them before their interrogation. Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a custom article now from our expert writers.Get a Custom EssayFinally, this landmark case and court decision, now calling for the rights of a suspect as "Miranda Rights", created a procedure that police officers must follow so that when suspects are informed of their rights, they are fully aware of the statements they are making. The "Miranda Rights" also showed that there will be negative consequences if the police do not make their rights known..