blog
media download page
Essay / Mike Stuchbery's View on Corporal Punishment in Schools Australian Christian schools are sparking ethical questions and debates over their hypocritical education. system. On July 1, 2011, in a letter to the editor titled “The Cane: Corporal Punishment Has No Place in Our Schools,” high school teacher Mike Stuchbery despairingly condemned the legality of such shameful behavior in schools. . Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Speaking in an impassioned tone, Stuchbery uses an introductory anecdotal reference as a high school teacher, to allow readers to feel the positive atmosphere within a normal environment. school environment. The depiction of calm relaxation in his "Teaching Nirvana" suggests that his work as a teacher is a pleasant gift and is contradictory to that of the supporting image. However, he colloquially changes the tone by using a comparative reference to corporal punishment used at Craigmore Christian School, Central Queensland Christian College and an unnamed South Australian school. Comparing these schools with his own implies a clear distinction between the treatment of students, whose physical abuse is clearly unnecessary for disciplinary purposes. Stuchbery indignantly questions why teachers are allowed to "hit" students with a "wooden or bamboo tool", appealing to a sense of fury as readers become aware of the violence and torture that exist in an environment of vulnerable young learners. In a stern tone, Stuchbery explains that "whatever the justifications given, physically beating a child...is unacceptable", appealing to readers' moral sense and sympathy for the children's well-being. Specifically, by calling the beatings “barbaric,” he shows readers and especially parents how savagely cruel teachers are. He then logically explains that creating wounds on a young person's buttocks is "simple torture", further channeling our outrage towards these actions, tapping into the sense of righteousness against the misuse of discipline. Readers will certainly be alarmed that teachers would have to report to child services if a student arrived at school with the same injuries they inflicted on them. As a result, the sarcastic reference to these "Christian" schools generally reflects Stuchbery's view that this is a distortion of Christian values among them. He infers from direct experience that punishments are intended for children who need loving help rather than physical abuse, generating sympathy for the need to guide these young children who will learn from their mistakes without harming their bodies. Referring to Jesus as “a guy,” he humorously recalls the teachings about loving others and not harming them from his attendance at Sunday school. Here he influences readers by getting in on the joke while remorsefully shaming Christian schools for their contradictory actions at the same time. Stuchbery provokes ridicule by citing in schools that punishments revolve around care. Furthermore, readers are told that the punishments are ironically followed by prayer sessions, exploiting the sense of outrage over the transition from conflict to peace. Stuchbery categorically condemns the way,.
Navigation
« Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next »
Get In Touch