The character or quality of technology within society is largely determined by ideology and the social environment, meaning that technology itself is neutral. When comparing the two texts, both texts can be said to have a conservative quality in their ideology, but these ideologies are completely different. In 1984, they are in a state of war where the party treats citizens more like a provision. In contrast, the hegemonic Brave New World ideology aims to keep citizens happy and away from the harshness of the world. To achieve this happy state, it is important to maintain the stability of citizens. According to Huxley's statement: “Mother, monogamy, romance. …how could they be stable? " (40) suggest that Mustafa Mond, one of the world controllers, decided to ban many human historical works to stabilize society by using technologies such as conditioning, hypnopaedia and replacing various pleasures of life human by the pleasure produced by soma and freedom of sex. On the other hand, in 1984, the holder of power took away freedom and pleasure from the citizen. Unlike the substitution of pleasure in Brave New World, the subtraction of pleasure does not. causes increasing instability within society To minimize instability and manage an efficient society, separating citizens from the instability factor through technology is much more effective than observing and restricting the citizen as in.