However, not everyone should attend college” (Pharinet 680). This shows how Phrinet makes it clear that she recognizes that education is important and that everyone has the right to go to school, but then she states her argument. In doing so, she allows readers to understand her point of view, without being able to question it. She then continues her argument by adding nodes to the opposition that allow other contradictory statements to be refined to a point where everyone's interpretation can be unified. She points out the fact: “If college is for everyone, why do we rely on SAT scores and high school transcripts? Why don't all schools have an open admissions policy? Simply because not everyone should go to college” (Pharinet 681). This example expresses another valid point that supports Phrinet's argument that college may not be for everyone. This allows the reader to get a glimpse of what additional information he brings into his argument that is completely true. This nevertheless allows us to understand and detail the mental processing of the argument. She uses the key elements of college admission against herself to support the theory of intelligence she uses like in scores or test scores. Therefore, if we were to