The way Sapiens started was fantastic. I believe this is an all-time must-read book - a brilliantly written collection of the thoughts of a curious person who has dedicated his life to science but doesn't want to bore you with his thesis. I loved how fascinating the author's voice and information about ancient times of humanity was. I lack proper knowledge about any non-fiction and the origin of humans, so I was eager to learn more about our origins. But I quickly grew tired of the author's ironic and condescending humor. His confidence emerged from all his words and personal opinions and the way he tried to enforce them annoyed me a little. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Here are some of the points I disagree with. On page 152, paragraph 10, chapter "There is no justice in history" on the hierarchy of Rich and poor, Harari states, apart from the fact that poverty is a natural state of humanity, it It takes insight and collaboration to get out of this kind of condition. Harari asks why do we have poverty? For this, he writes that most people born into poor families tend to be poor all their lives. Maybe it's the truth. But the real question here should have been why there is prosperity? Harari doesn't seem willing to justify the existence of this type of culture, and he completely avoids the concept of documented economic mobility of many Americans. In Chapter 6, Harari's "rewriting" of the Declaration of Independence is pure sophistry. self-evident truths, that all men evolved differently, that they are born with certain mutable characteristics, and that among these are life and the pursuit of pleasure. that Haari thinks that people don't believe in human equality because it's an objective truth, when that's not the case, they believe in it so that society can function in an organized way. Translating a statement of ideas into biological terms is a mistake. We know that it is useless to measure happiness; Harari simply replaced/alternated it with “pleasure” as if that was somehow more accurate. He could have simply attributed it to an increased level of endorphins. Harari mainly uses immature and clichéd alternations to deny the reality of the human soul and the presence of God. According to him, these abstruse and immaterial theories do not exist simply because scientists have not found them in a concrete and material world. But paradoxically, he claims that scientists do not know where the human mind resides, but there is scientific and apparent evidence of this fact. Harari fabulously states that the Catholic Church's statement "human life begins at the moment of conception" is not a scientific claim. statement but predetermined doctrine in which the inflexible Catholic believes. If this is the case, and there is nothing radically distinctive about the human being compared to the rest of beings, then why are the sufferings of domestic animals not taken into account, but not those of human embryos or fetus in case of abortion. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay For Harari, the only human quality responsible for human supremacy in nature is the capacity for flexible cooperation in contrast to the rigid one of the rest of the animals. No analysis to examine the underlying reasons for this..