In early America, the founding members of the democracy faced unparalleled adversity. In Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence, Elizabeth Stanton's Declaration of Sentiments, and the Cherokee Memorials, a new age of freedom is discovered through the authors' breathtaking prose fused with the abundant passion of the stifled self-expression of a group of peoples. Through the work of these three texts, readers of all generations can be inspired to create their own identity, despite the forces of an outside source holding them back. Despite the stifling, each author managed to bring about significant change in America's short but fraught history. If these authors did not express their opinions, the country would not be what it is today. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In all three texts, revolt is infused in every word, illustrating the horrific testimonies the authors had to endure. With the complete change in the government, culture and lifestyles of the new nation of the world, the literature of this period transformed into a sphere of individualism, self-evaluation and meticulous thinking. The voices of the authors of these plays work while attacking their intended audiences with words that bite the conscience of oppressive governments and shattering the unfortunate and painfully obvious stereotypes that manifested themselves in the early American image. Thomas Jefferson, a key player in writing and establishing the nation's founding document, traces Britain's many injustices in the original copy of the Declaration of Independence. In this work, the original unedited portions of his document are conveniently juxtaposed with the changes made by the Supreme Court to appease the king. An interesting comparison between Jefferson's first draft and the second draft can be seen instantly. Jefferson wrote a fierce and unapologetic critique of his oppressors, while the revision greatly diminishes Jefferson's writings. Paragraphs of criticism become synonymous with lack of bite. Not only do his cheerful and poignant words affect the document, but the form in which he writes these words also adds to the amount of hatred Jefferson feels toward his audience. As Jefferson progresses through the text, he begins each main point with the phrase “He has.” “He has” has a conversational tone, almost as if Jefferson was giving a speech in front of his opponents, grappling with the idea of ​​self-identification through the individualist mentality. Jefferson tells the opposing party what they did instead of suggesting, passively arguing, or arguing. Jefferson wastes no time saying what he wants. Of the many reasons why this document was so successful, the one that stands out is its length. Obviously, Jefferson wanted to achieve many goals, but the brevity of the Declaration of Independence helped him prove his points in a timely manner. Simply because it gave the intended audience the necessary and vital conditions of the new country that Jefferson was dying to pursue, the document carried weight with those who read it. On another note, the tone Jefferson adopted in this piece could have given him a little more breathing room. If Jefferson approached his proposal on his knees, he may have achieved nothing; but, because his decision to give his oppressors a surprising tone proved effective, Jefferson's work was infinitely effective. In addition to short statements andconcise on reforming the country, Jefferson's tight tone gives the impression that he was actually speaking. Jefferson fearlessly transfers his intense desire for freedom and independence through the complex words of the Declaration of Independence. In 1830, several years after the Declaration of Independence was drafted and established, the Cherokee nation published The Cherokee Memorials. This document ironically reflects The Declaration of Independence, an intentional correction made by the many authors who composed this piece. Much like the Declaration of Independence, this document was also written under the consideration and supervision of many people, proving that it was an effort guided and fueled by the people. To begin with, the Cherokee Nation was under heavy fire from Andrew Jackson and was being treated poorly by the American people. This group of stubborn authors decided to dissect the ancient document that built our nation's culture. They did so in a way that deserves to be applauded, because just as Thomas Jefferson cruelly criticized his oppressors, so did the Cherokee. The hypocritical smears that have come out of the mouths of the US government have caused problems for many innocent people - loss of land, loss of pride, loss of lives. This document not only made the American people aware of the seriousness of the situation, but it made the American people aware of the seriousness of the situation. like Jefferson, gave them a sense of freedom, autonomy, and genteel pride. The collective of authors makes its case by asserting its position with strength, pride and class. Oddly enough, Jefferson did the same thing. By referring to America as “our nation” and describing their Cherokee heritage as “the Cherokee Nation,” Cherokee peoples establish themselves for themselves in the face of adversity. These small details, placed at the beginning of the document, are not trivial. Declaring themselves important from the start suggests a trust that the U.S. government probably did not know existed in the hearts of the Cherokee. The Cherokee peoples mock probably the most important and effective document in American history, and they, like Thomas Jefferson, do so without fear. The way this text is written also suggests a hidden confidence and presence of power in the written voice of the Cherokee. The oppressed minority, in this case the Cherokee, often acts with unexpected intensity. The US government viewed this group of people as dirt, and this post proved otherwise. The authors use declarative statements to make their point, officially authorizing the denial of their citizenship. Later, in America's unfortunately long history of unfair treatment and oppression, Elizabeth Stanton revolutionized the nascent women's rights movement with her publication, Declaration of Sentiments. Stanton is seriously damaging the pride and joy of our Founding Fathers in his work. Like each of our other authors, she studied the inner shell of the Declaration of Independence and found where she could take advantage of it. Stanton, like Jefferson, uses the phrase "He has" as an obvious sign that she is playing with the idea of ​​the Declaration of Independence. It lays out a set of problems and even indicates how to solve them, tracing the inaccuracy of the Declaration of Independence. The uneven truths of the First Declaration are easy to exploit for Stanton, who uses the earlier rules to act on his own passions. She separated herself from the government by expressing her unpopular views, a controversial action for a woman at that time in history. Stanton imitates the Declaration,.