According to Carl Von Clausewitz, war is therefore an act of force aimed at compelling our enemy to do our will. It is used to counter the enemy using modern types of equipment or weaponry. It is a physical force in which two opposing forces attempt to outwit each other to achieve victory. Added to this force are also certain limitations such as international law and custom. So the means of war is to impose our will on the enemy, that is its objective. To win, one must render the other powerless, for that is the true purpose of war. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay What is War? War has different types of elements down to its parts and sections, then war has different types of elements down to its parts and sections then finally its internal structure as a whole. From simple to complex, war must be understood in its nature as a whole because war does not operate separately but as one. To begin with, the elements, let's start with the maximum use of force. Good-hearted people would always think of another way to fight without too much bloodshed, and that is what they believe to be the true goal of war. It may seem real, but war is dangerous and kindness produces the worst outcome of war. Because in reality, even if one uses maximum force and the other does not, the one who applied it will always win. Then the goal is to disarm the enemy, as we said before, the goal of war is to deprive or reduce capabilities. to use enemy weapons. Third, The maximum effort of force, if one wants to defeat the other, then he must exert his full potential to destroy the other's resistance. The author made a good idea and a very interesting discussion about the war. He used the words nature and purpose to emphasize his view of war based on his experience of the Napoleonic Wars. For me, the strength of the article lies in the very idea of ​​war, in that its true nature or purpose is to outwit the opponent with brute force in order to achieve victory in every battle. weakness and it is because it is inaccurate or incomplete. Not all of Clausewitz's ideas or concepts are applicable to today's future warfare, as many factors affect battles. One reason why I consider the article weak is that it is based primarily on the Napoleonic Wars, as not all the small details that could be considered in the conduct of wars have been included. For example, the effective use of modern technology which can be an important factor in battle. For me, reading chapter 1 of the book was a good choice because it introduces us to the main or true nature of war. And not only that, but it can also be easily understood because it uses words that are not too complicated. From the introduction to the end of the chapter, one can clearly interpret the meaning of each idea presented. I don't really like the concepts presented by the author, because I'm more of a fan of Sun Tzu than him. Because for me, going to war does not have to be a bloodbath, but only putting in a minimum of effort to achieve the goal. And that's what I believe, that's why I'm against Clausewitz in some of his ideas. In conclusion, war with or without the use of full force remains war. And considering other factors affecting the war, things are not going the way we want because it is a battle of wits. Even if we follow these.