Linguistic style is the way people express their intentions and understand the words of others, and it is influenced by many elements, such as experiences of childhood, cultural context, and their position in the workplace. The central idea of ​​this article is that people's different linguistic styles not only lead to different outcomes for men and women in the workplace, but also lead people to misunderstand others in communication. In childhood, boys are encouraged to rise to higher positions in the group, for example. where they are expected to showcase their abilities and knowledge as much as possible. Boys who enjoy high status in their group will be seen as leaders, and leaders should give orders to other boys of lower status. On the other hand, the linguistic styles of girls are different from those of boys. Girls should put themselves in an inferior position and avoid embarrassing or frustrating others, otherwise they will receive negative responses from other girls. The way people communicate with others will gradually become their own linguistic style and bring significant influences to their careers. In the workplace, differences in linguistic style allow men and women to perform distinctly. Men's linguistic style encourages them to take as many opportunities as possible to showcase their abilities, and what men learn from childhood allows them to express their ideas and thoughts in an acceptable and understandable way. Since men actively demonstrate their abilities, they will be more recognized by their colleagues and promoted by their bosses. On the other hand, girls believe that appearing stronger than others will cause them embarrassment or frustration, which negatively affects their reputation. Girls aren't used to giving orders in the middle of a paper... and I lost the grade simply because my paper didn't meet the teacher's expectations. I actually misunderstood the professor's directive to focus on just one main idea in a single paragraph. However, I finally realized and admitted the fact that I had missed some points after having a conversation with Dr. Mittoo. When I argued that I had certainly followed his requirements, he simply asked me a few simple questions and gave me time to find the answer. After finding the answers to his questions, I had to admit that I was missing some points. And then Dr. Mittoo explained to me the correct ways to accomplish the tasks. In this case, I admit that I made mistakes in the writing work, and I am fully convinced that my work did not answer the professor's questions. I now believe that admitting my mistakes can help me learn and improve, rather than being a signal of weakness..