Regular physical activity as part of diabetes management regimen can effectively improve metabolic profiles, reduce hypertension and reduce mortality due to vascular complications. As is known, aerobic training (AT) is followed by an increase in exercise volume associated with a decrease in morbidity. The article summarizes the study that was performed to determine a resistance training protocol that optimally improves glycemic control (primary objective), as well as cardiovascular risk factors and anthropometry in T2DM (secondary objectives ) while controlling total exercise volume. The study compared training volumes and intensities of previously successful protocols in an effort to better define optimal RT parameters. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get the original essay The hypothesis was that high-intensity RT would provide a superior training stimulus to improve glycemic control and risk factors cardiovascular than RT at lower volume and intensity. protocol, when the total amount of work performed is kept constant. Overall, the aim of the study was to compare different volumes and intensities of resistance training (RT) combined with aerobic training (AT) to improve glycemic control and cardiovascular health in people with type 2 diabetes ( DT2). two participants (48% women) for the study and they were divided into three groups: usual care (RT1), high intensity RT (RT2) or endurance RT (RT3), with the same volume of work in RT2 and RT3. They were randomized into this 6-month trial and were not participating in any other exercise training at the time of recruitment. The article itself was well designed, however, some small errors occurred during reading. Most of the time people do not go through the whole article but choose to read the summary or summary (whichever is provided) in order to understand the objectives and after that will come the decision to read the article in more detail. detailed manner or not. These people may not be statisticians or have statistical training. This is why it is important that the summary is more readable and includes fewer statistical or mathematical parameters. In our case, the summary was well written, however, the statistical figures and the large number of parentheses make it a little messy. This happens throughout the article because most of the sentences were long and had parentheses causing you to get lost in the paragraph, making it a bit bulky. One of the great things about this item was that it was designed so that each part had its own space. chat, and allow you to find what you want very easily and quickly. The other advantage is graphs and tables, because most of the time they are really "user friendly", plus they usually make it clearer to see what was discussed. The methods and materials part was really strong as it clearly outlined the steps that were taken during the study. The subtests were organized and divided in such a way that each part showed the importance of each stage of the study, starting with the participants in the test exercises. The other well-organized part concerns the references with the correct addresses and notations in the text. This is not the least important part because it shows how many searches you have done and how accurate your.