Individuals in the public eye strive to discover happiness in themselves, in others, and in their environments. What are the factors that lead to extreme satisfaction in life? What moral choices must be overcome to acquire this incomparable satisfaction that everyone undertakes? The people of Omelas struggle to achieve the goal of choosing the preferred moral choice. In exchange for their happiness and ultimate success, there is the despair of a child. In order to live their “perfect” life, the people of Omelas must recognize the permanence of the child. Settling for a preferred moral choice is difficult, but important to end unfair play by the general public. Neglecting to overcome moral issues in the town of Omelas is illustrated through three distinct characters in the story. There are those who ignore the situation, those who watch over the child in misery and those who feel that they should leave. In the story "Those Who Walk Away from Omelas", the characters neglect to address moral issues in their general public, and the reader is shown the importance of good obligation and the ramifications of the difficult task of choose the preferred moral choice. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay In “Those Who Walk Away from Omelas,” those who are ignorant and unaware are responsible for neglecting to do the best possible moral choice. in the general public of Omelas. Every resident of Omelas is expected to realize that there is a sense of despair about the satisfaction of the general population. Individuals who are content to realize that it exists are those who explicitly overlook the problem and simply move on with their ideal, happy lives realizing that a young person is in despair in exchange for their happiness. It is recognized that if one does not strive to consider ethics and if one does not think about a response to a problem in the public arena, the problems will disappear without anyone else. Being insensitive to problems in the public eye is seen as a response to solving them. The people who neglect the town of Omelas realize that the child is there and do not wonder how the problem could be solved, taking into account individual happiness, the satisfaction of others and the joy of the child. This places them in the position of spectators of the problem. They all realize this one must be there. Some of them understand why, some of them don't, but they all understand that their happiness... It depends entirely on the despair of this current child. Individual happiness is a need for those in Omelas, whether or not it is in exchange for the misery of a child. This is a moral dilemma that the natives neglect to overcome appropriately. They solve this problem by ignoring the circumstances and seeking to solve the problem without anyone else. In fact, recognizing that the child is there in misery is a prerequisite for living in Olmelas. Neglecting this circumstance is a person's choice, which ultimately makes the problem worse than it was before. Moral duty and appropriate moral choices are not taken into account, making the general public indifferent and neglecting the enormous problem of the boy which persists enormously so that the people of Omelas can continue their "immaculate" lives. town of Omelas, there are some who neglect, but there are also natives who look at the boy with misery. Individuals who go to visit the child just to observe and observe the child in his misery, further decide not to deal with the problem and behaveas observers of a reprehensible act in the public space. Some really share the torment and kick the young person to keep him going. The others never came closer, but they looked at him with angry, nauseated eyes. The general population who comes to see participates in the activities of putting the young person to death by pushing the activity forward and even shares the blows of the tyke. They create a belief system that it is common in the public eye to visit a child to understand the problem, but do nothing to understand it. These young spectators are constantly stunned and sickened by this sight. They feel nauseous, which they thought was better than that. They feel outrage, shock and ineptitude, despite the considerable number of clarifications. The general population who comes to see the child and are stunned to see the young person and the agony and misery in which he finds himself. So why should the general population of Omelas go to visit the child, and still not strive to discover the objectives of a serious problem in the public space. The natives need recognition to see that what they have been taught is actually evident. Regardless, when they discover the youth's repulsions in the cellar, they do not care and "go home in tears or with tearless fury." The arrangement that is by all accounts the "rule" of life in public space is that after observing and visiting the young person, the citizens' tears in the face of unpleasant injustice dry up when they begin to see the horrible fairness of the real world. , and to recognize it. When society recognizes the poor state of their own city, they become observers of the situation and become disappointments in correcting the imbalance in their audience. Here and there, after observing the child in agony and despair, people "do not go home to sob or with fury, [they do not], in truth, they go home by any stretch of the imagination.” There are some who leave Omelas in a state of total distress and perplexity. The weight of the bad form of society grows on these individuals to such an extent that they can no longer be part of the general public that gives them the most happiness. Although it may seem, it is the most ideal approach to conquer the moral choice of satisfaction. Is it extremely reasonable to leave a problem on the network and abandon it? Some will say that those who leave are those who deserve the definitive satisfaction that Omelas brings. Simply walking away from the imbalance in society and failing will not solve the problem. They leave the "spotless" town of Omelas recognizing that there is nothing they can do to fix the problem, so the basic arrangement is obviously to leave and leave the joy and betrayal behind. » They advance in the darkness and they do not return. Where they are headed is somewhere even less imaginable for the majority of us in the city of complacency. From time to time, the main practical response to society's criminal acts is to withdraw from society and leave behind the problems that were so difficult to understand. The Neglects, the Watchers, and the Leavers are characters in the story who neglect to address the moral issues of their general audience. These characters can be found as a general rule and can be contrasted with the characters of natives around the world. The ramifications of individual joy are the work of a child or someone not getting paid enough in cash in a third world country. Unlike the general public of Omelas where the joy of/10.1177/097168580401000209)