Genetic fingerprinting has become one of the best scientific methods for identifying genetic information called DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). DNA fingerprinting is an unforgettable part of society because it helps prove innocence or guilt in criminal cases, resolve immigration disputes, and clarify paternity. This trial will examine whether newborns should be DNA profiled at birth by analyzing both the positive and negative aspects of this procedure. Being a relatively new procedure, there are many arguments for and against DNA fingerprinting of newborns. Arguments supporting this procedure are that it facilitates the determination of paternity and the resolution of forensic crime scenes. However, there are also arguments against this procedure, including concerns about confidentiality and accuracy. Forensic scientists have long been curious about using genetic information to match crime scene evidence with suspects in criminal investigations. However, recently the lack of a proper experimental approach prevented them from achieving this until DNA profiling was discovered. During the 1980s, geneticist Alec Jeffreys discovered how to take genetic fingerprints using a drop of one's own blood. Since then, DNA fingerprinting has been used on hundreds of thousands of people in many countries and has helped trap hundreds of killers, free innocent people, and revolutionize science and criminal justice. DNA fingerprinting is a process with many steps that takes a lot of time. The first step in creating a genetic fingerprint requires obtaining a DNA sample, a strand of hair, a drop of blood, or even skin cells. Each of these DNA samples contains white blood cells that are broken down using a detergent. In the middle of the article, daily life and possible genetic disorders as well as certain genetic traits such as predilection and antisocial behavior. Another argument against genetic fingerprinting at birth is that there can be problems with the accuracy and quality of the fingerprint. The accuracy can be off because fingerprints change from baby to child and from child to adult and do not remain static. The fingerprint pattern may still be similar, but it may be more difficult to automatically search for the fingerprint compared to an adult size. Additionally, any form of fingerprint injury would make an individual's entry into the database fashionable. There are clearly many obvious benefits to DNA fingerprinting babies at birth, as this procedure is used in forensics. He helped solve many crimes by turning away suspects and helping identify and convict the culprit..