Across the world, gender stereotypes exist in the workplace. Typically, male counterparts hold leadership positions in the workplace. However, when women are in the boss's shoes, questions arise. This can be seen in two articles in which Business Times author Shiao (2016) argues for a female boss, and Balanced Careers author Wolfe (2017) argues for a female boss. boss. Although both articles are similar in the claims of people preferring male bosses, the difference is that the Balance Careers article is more reliable regarding author trustworthiness, article trustworthiness, and accuracy of statements. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In terms of similarity, both articles agree that the majority of employees are in favor of working for a male boss. According to Shiao (2016), when comparing 76 percent of Singapore's employees to the global average of 65 percent, this figure is much higher in our country and this shows the high propensity of having a male boss. Similarly, Wolfe (2017) stated that since 1953, the Gallup poll indicates that workers always prefer the male boss. This shows that even though the two articles present different views on female bosses, the stereotype that the male boss is a superior still exists among workers. However, when it comes to determining the authority of authors, there are differences depending on their areas of specialization. Lahle Wolfe has eight years of experience in writing, where she advises women in business fields and is part of the Women's Mentor Network. While for Vivien Shao, she has five years of journalism experience and mainly focuses on finance and has only written a few topics on women. This shows that the article written by Wolfe is more trustworthy because not only is she an advocate for women, but she is also qualified to have extensive experience, consulting expertise, interest in women's empowerment, and in-depth knowledge business women compared to Vivien where she has little experience and are not experts in the field. The next significant difference is the reliability of the item. The Balance Careers article was published in the Women In Business section and aims to provide women with useful information in the business sector. Additionally, there was verifiable evidence of statistical data to counterbalance the arguments of male and female bosses. In contrast, the Business Time article was published in the opinion section, where emotions and facts are used to influence the reader to accept the author's views. This can be seen in the informal language used in the article, such as “you, me, our, admit it” to form a one-sided view. Thus, the first article is more compelling than the second because not only is it less biased, but it provides more factual and balanced information on the role of women among leaders. Wolfe's claims are supported by an external report. Wolfe (2017) stated that the attributes of initiative and competence, once considered reserved for men's abilities to demonstrate that they are better than women within the organization, are now outclassed by women. This is true since Patel's (2013) report indicates that in Fortune 500 companies, when there are at least three women on the board of directors, they bring results.