Part 2 – Research Proposal1 IntroductionGlobalization requires a vital course of action that supports the creation and support of preferences at the global level (Pfeiffer, Goodstein, & Nolan, 1992). The key action plan builds from the circumstances of the mutant annuity to a dream of an imagined future state, with a glimpse of the actual path. It brings together and deciphers spatial determinations, assets and capabilities, vehicles of speculation and joint effort, as well as the timing and succession of targeted movements, into another profit model (Slywotsky and Morrison, 1997), a economic development model (Higgins, 1977) and an economic development model (Higgins, 1977). significant authoritarian character (Albert & Whetten, 1985). The impacts of globalization on vital action plans are both homogenizing (“convergence” school) and mixed advertising (divergence school). Convergence researchers (Pascale and Maguire, 1980) argue that as countries change their activities, create institutions, adopt current technology, and achieve industrialization, vital business conduct will become comparable as individuals acquire regular qualities of respect. investment movements and work-related behaviors (England & Lee, 1974; Kerr et al., 1964). Rather, Divergence researchers attest that national society, not a financial belief system or innovative development, is (and will continue to be) the It is an overwhelming constraint in shaping qualities, beliefs and behavior of administrators within a nation (Hofstede, 1980, Laurent, 1983). Many researchers highlight the usefulness of comparability (Child, 1981): globalization is not about converging on best practices, but rather about leveraging contrast in an inexorably borderless world to augment separate positions. ..ooks to make the search more authentic and accurate. Although this type of research is mainly secondary and the data or studies found may be outdated to provide an accurate analysis, it can still be carried out alongside the quantitative analysis to reach a definitive conclusion in the thesis.3.1 RationaleThrough analysis, our research justification would be to conclude the dilemma or debate between convergence and divergence in globalization. Which of the two is more effective for a business or under what circumstances should each be used. The methodology as discussed will be conducted on the basis of this motive.4 ConclusionThe conclusion will be based on the analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data collected from the primary and secondary research carried out using the questionnaire and various journals, books and online. sources.