The English Civil War was a concatenation of events in England, between the Royalists and the Parliamentarians. Beginning in 1642 during the reign of Charles I, the civil war lasted nearly three decades in a kingdom plagued by theological disputes, political conflicts over the doctrine of legitimacy, and a monarch's massive debt. in front of Parliament. It goes without saying that the English Civil War dominated, through the new model of army and reforms and programs, including the Protectorate and the Commonwealth, the results of an inclement schism and contemporary constitutional and military ideals. In order to understand how and why the English Civil War took place and why it brought about such stupendous changes in England, Ireland and Scotland, one must understand the causes of the English Civil War. Historians have long held conflicting views about the origins of the Civil War. Several claims have been attacked, either on the basis of their refutability or their ambiguity. We should also consider the postmodernists, who expressed their belief that, simply put, the analysis of causes restricts a resolution in terms of history. However, by exposing the sources and deducing the causes, which could ultimately be divided into economic, political and religious positions, and further into revisionist and Marxist positions, it becomes evident that a cause did not result in an event, but that a culmination of causes has rather resulted. in a number of events. This is essential to understand. By the time Charles rose to power in 1625, the wars of Rohan were well underway. Huguenot rebellions began to spread across France, creating political and diplomatic tensions. Louis XIII, the Catholic monarch, found it increasingly difficult to...... middle of paper... come out. Some see it as a class war, while others see the origins of the war as being evident in long-term and/or short-term mismanagement. It is interesting to note that all the assertions have been confronted with Pyrrhonism. This may be because many of the possible causes are not mutually exclusive. Take for example the marriage between religious, economic and political origins. It soon becomes apparent that the civil war was the result of both long and short term causes encompassing a wide range of factions, which were dealt with by an incompetent monarch. This is not to say that Charles I was a cause. He did not create religious partition, but exacerbated it through his totalitarian policies. He did not create financial ruin, but, through the sanctions he suffered as a result of illegal money-raising methods, he only dug a deeper hole for himself and for the world. 'England..