The first proposition states that the wage gap has widened due to increased dependence among the American working class. The argument states that “lazy” nations have the opportunity but not the motivation to earn a decent income. In the Autor article, the author concludes that "Even in a society with perfect equality of opportunity, one might expect the children of successful parents to experience above-average success in life." he adulthood, simply because many attributes that contribute to success (appearance, intellect, athleticism) are partly hereditary. » (Author) This supports the first proposition that the country's "lazy people" remain poor, assuming that children's success is a reflection of parents' success. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The first proposition argues that individuals have the opportunity to move forward and choose to be lazy and dependent on government systems. In turn, when these individuals have children, they will be raised in an environment that emphasizes the attributes that prevented the family from achieving upward mobility. This is a vicious circle that creates a great distance between the country's rich and poor. The second proposal states that the wage gap can be blamed on the government's affiliations with the nation's highest-earning individuals and businesses. The second proposal promotes the creation of an equitable tax distribution that would redistribute funds to help low-income individuals and families achieve upward mobility. The author discusses the process of creating equal opportunities for individuals of any socioeconomic status. The author mentions that the results of the programs can take time to appear and even extend over several generations. Autor states that there are "many shorter-term levers that directly moderate inequality without imposing substantial economic costs: the application of progressive tax and transfer policies that finance public finances." investments and fostering opportunities for children of all socio-economic backgrounds” (Author). This statement reflects the second proposal on fiscal redistribution. In this section of the article, the author explains that these types of programs can be beneficial in closing the income gap, but these results take time. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. a custom article now written by our expert writers.Get a custom essayBefore reading the author's article, I found that the second proposal seemed more accurate. After reading the article, I maintain this choice. The second proposition is relevant in my life and I see the results. I couldn't attend college without help from government programs. The first proposal contains some points that seem superficially accurate, but does not take into account that the cost of living in the United States is higher than the minimum wage. People with a limited skill set and no opportunity to develop those skills are stuck in a tough situation. When they live on a salary less than their expenses, it is impossible not to turn to the government (the creator of that salary) for help..