blog
media download page
Essay / Racism and the Persistence of Unconscious Bias in the Writing of Brent Staples as a black man in public places. . Staples offers his point of view by making the audience believe that he is committing a crime, but ultimately states how his actions towards him are due to the fear associated with his labeled stereotypes of rapists, muggers, and gangsters. He continues to open the audience up from a 20 year old and gives insight into how even though he has proven his survival compared to other stereotypical black people in his levels of education and ethics of work in contemporary times, he is still in a similar situation. difficult situation (Brunson and Miller 613). This essay offers a rhetorical analysis of “Black Men and the Public Space” by Brent Staples that attempts to present to people something that many are guilty of but pay little attention to. Drawing on his and others' perceptions, Staples' essay reveals the racist propensity of people to believe that black men are violent and harmful. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayAnalysisThe reason for the article “Just Walk on By: Black Men and Public Space” is to illustrate how unconscious bias as well that racism persists. He uses many rhetorical approaches to ensure that readers understand his perception. He achieves this by using language, pathos, a fun form of writing. Diction is a huge part of the article. He uses terms such as “As I walked toward the avenue behind her,” as well as “Both hands thrust into her bulky military jacket” (Staples 267). The swinging, voluminous and jostled words create an aggressive impression on the images professed by the public. Many other terms he uses to expand on this feeling include: “after a few more quick glances, she picked up the pace and was soon running in earnest” Staples 266). Another pattern in which he applies language highlights his abilities when he indicates that the feeling of fear wrongly associated with him in public places often tastes terrifying (Greene & Owen 26). The evocative terms he uses are particular and develop a scholarly perception. Staples uses pathos to attract readers in many diverse aspects. Fear is an emotion that he strives to express using quotes that expand on the feeling and reaffirm it by indicating that it has become recognizable with the diction of fear. Staples uses mockery as well as humor to get the audience to identify with him, thus allowing them to consent. with him. It gives the idea that suffering from insomnia; it harasses sleep. The observation follows a serious paragraph saying that it is not clear how he reached twenty-two. This article represents an exceptional piece of minority literature of the present (Staples 265). The essay is of high quality and the author relates it to blacks as well as other ethnic groups. In this essay, Staples makes many valid points and poignant observations regarding the injustice experienced by black people in common social contexts. He indicates his righteous anger at the deep-rooted prejudices and infrequent horror that black people experience. The appearance of this writing is not exceptional, for a marginal writing in America full of similar ideas. However, what makes the essay special in its own way is the alternative projected by the author on the matter. Instead of using point of viewessential to a hostile confrontation against racial injustices, the author attempts to visualize the issue from the point of view of white Americans and seeks to ease their anxieties (Pain 900). This is a particular observation in the context of minority and black literature. Even though the logic used by the writer can be considered weak and his attitude submissive, it takes courage for an individual from the minority group to obtain and provide an olive branch. The remaining parts of this writing clarify additional purposes as to why such issues are so argued in favor of Staples' position. Remembering the historic times of racial reconciliation that took place in the United States, it is correct to indicate that anti-war leaders in the form of Martin Luther abandoned a very lasting legacy compared to conflicting legacies similar to Malcolm X. Essentially, in the modern era, the similarity would extend to scholars in the form of Cornell West versus voluble ethnoreligious leaders like Louis Farrakhan. . Even though both sides have reasonable viewpoints to support their positions, it is the balanced and cool assessment of peaceful leaders that triumphs (Staples 266). A similar measure is relevant to Brent Staples' point of view, based on a nuanced and balanced assessment and intended to contribute to a calm settlement. Furthermore, while recognizing the justification for black male belligerence, the author highlights its fundamental flows. Although many of the observations come from Staples' individual experiences, the writing is commendable for its deliberation on contrasting perspective. For example, the mention of Norman Podhoretz's controversial article titled "My Negro Problem and Ours" is exaggerated because it indicates the many problems that black people have faced in the past. Besides the apparently racist tone of the essay under review, the author does not indicate the valid explanations provided by Podhoretz. For example, Staples agrees with his colleagues in identifying the particular variety of wary recklessness that black men represented (Pain 899). The major problem with the author's scrutiny of Podhoretz's perceptions is the appropriate labeling of all black men, as it is unapologetically not fair to classify an entire society as distressing because of one suspicious irritability. However, aside from this minor error in Staples's speech, behind many of the writer's assertions lies a heavy reality. And finally, in a spectacle of fictional mockery, the self-proclaimed “authority to change the public space” pushes the writer to modify his behavior and his confidential thoughts. When the prejudices exemplified by the white group are heavily incorporated into their overnight debauchery, a very practical alternative is sought. In what is considered the most unforgettable final part of this work, the writer tells readers how he learned to turn tense circumstances into friendly ones (Staples 268). Staples shows the audience how his adoption of a considerate stance in the public room changed his individual experience. Although he is not informative as to his model, there is some aspect of a serious proposition in his statements. The author highlights the fact that he was an alumnus of the University of Chicago, allowing readers to understand that he is a scholar who most likely has appropriate information on what he is referring to. Alongside his college studies, Staples worked as a journalist in Chicago. When discussing blacks in the past of aggression, the author alludes to a famous essay and incorporates.
Navigation
« Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next »
Get In Touch