Although many children are born with special talents or opportunities that might have allowed them to be creative, innovative, or fascinating, they grew up to be functional adults who want to make a lot of money. money instead of making their dreams come true. Traditional education helps people become an integral part of society, contributes to improving their lives and teaches them values, knowledge and beliefs. However, the traditional education system has caused many controversies since the beginning of formal education, because traditional education can harm children's ability to think creatively, innovate, and develop a fascinating mind. Since the beginning of formal education, traditional education has never deviated from its standard curriculum, the goal of which is the socialization and memorization of students. The most serious problem is that many countries follow the same educational methods, which kill children's creativity. Additionally, many countries focus only on uniformity, memorization, and passing exams. Most schools do not care about the aspirations of their students, even if they may be blessed with great talents and creativity, because these qualities are not practical for future generations. Traditional education must be modified to nurture children's creativity, one of the most essential qualities for the future of society and the lives of its citizens. This essay will answer the question “How do schools kill creativity?” ". Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay Every country has its own norms, beliefs and values ​​to create its own culture and future success. Interestingly, however, most countries use the same assessment standards, which do not encourage creativity, only simplistically assess students' grades and fundamental abilities, and can kill their fascinating and inquisitive minds as well as their ability to think creatively. In the article “Advantages and Disadvantages of Standardized Testing,” the author states that standard assessment cannot measure student performance, such as their growth over the course of a year. Additionally, it cannot assess students' “soft skills,” such as creativity, cooperation, and motivation, because the standard assessment only judges specific skills such as reading, math, and writing. For example, Sir Ken Robinson presents a good example in a young girl named "Gillian Lynne" in the video "Do Schools Kill Creativity?" Gillian's parents take her to the hospital because she has difficulty concentrating on her studies and is unable to sit still. The doctor attributed her problems to her potential to become a dancer. She became one of the most famous dancers in the world. As the example shows, traditional education does not care about what students want, and imposing the same assessment standards causes students to lose their unique opportunities and abilities. The goal of traditional education is for children to grow up to be functioning, career-minded adults so that they can contribute to society. In addition, it is useful to gain useful knowledge for the future. Nevertheless, traditional education remains a controversial topic due to its methods. In the article "How Schools Kill Creativity", Line Dalile states that "our mission is to ensure that the next generation will be full of inventors and mathematicians who, in turn, will lead humanity toanother level.” According to Dalile, the current education system believes that many scientists are needed to contribute greatly to society. Traditional education needs students to follow the curriculum to succeed because it is the best way to get good grades, knowledge, and eventually a job; however, these educational methods kill the creativity and individual talents of students. Matthew Lynch states that “the education system does not prepare students for the real world by stifling their imagination. In teaching to the test, learning by memorization and using a standardized curriculum, we have lost our imagination and creativity. Students learned to follow by heart and play. To support this argument, many students seem to be preparing to become robots, by following the same curriculum. Employing the same educational methods causes all students to share common beliefs and values, which discourages them from thinking creatively because the standard curriculum does not value students' interests, desires, and goals. For example, the American education system forces students to follow narrow paths that leave little room for error and place more emphasis on meeting predefined requirements, as Saulat cites. Standard teaching focuses solely on student socialization. Student creativity is the most essential part of society. Without creativity, the world would lose its future, its opportunities and its values. Nevertheless, many schools still believe that specific traditional subject areas such as reading, writing, and mathematics are more important than creativity. Although traditional education has many advantages, such as good communication between teachers and students, it has many negative effects on students. As soon as students start studying, they lose motivation and interest in what they want. Isabelle Demers says this is because not all schools are created equal, leading to inconsistent academic performance and motivation. Lack of motivation causes depression, high stress levels and bad influences on relationships. Additionally, lack of motivation leads to lack of career guidance among students. Having a dream is the most important thing for people's future. However, traditional education does not prepare students for the real world by stifling imagination, as highlighted in the article “Does Education Kill Imagination?” ". For example, students cannot learn something important in their lives while following the same standard curriculum. Additionally, Korean students study hard but work for low wages. Many students lose sight of where they want to go and what they want to do, even if they study hard. As we mentioned, traditional education harms students' creativity and curiosity. It also has many negative influences on students, such as lack of motivation and lack of career guidance. This is why most people think that traditional education should be changed. However, some believe that there is no need to change traditional education because it has several advantages. Traditional education can help people gain experience in various technologies, develop good communication skills, expand their knowledge and inform debate. Matthew Lynch points out that traditional education can reveal students' strengths and weaknesses. “This would work well in a group project, where each individual could show both their strengths and weaknesses.