Many governments monitor their residents' Internet use for a variety of reasons, including to protect national security. Although this practice has raised many ethical concerns, such as the collection of data on citizens, it has been justified far too often as a necessary evil in the interest of national security. Although many governments cite security reasons to justify their surveillance, many people believe that this act actually results in unauthorized access to private information that may not even pose a danger to the general well-being of the population. nation. There are two main schools of thought in this debate, each considering surveillance on radically different platforms. On the one hand, many Internet users believe that because they are proficient in using the Internet, they do not need surveillance that infringes on their right to privacy. On the other hand, there are those who are more socially conscious and believe that the government is monitoring them in order to protect them from certain domestic and international threats. This school of thought generally makes the argument that if they have nothing to hide, it doesn't matter if they are being watched. Surveillance in the media has primarily been linked to governments, most notably the United States. However, it has also been linked to activities such as the collection of personal information about employees of private sector companies. Internet-related surveillance has become increasingly prevalent in the recent past, due to the growing number and diversity of Internet users. The culprits of this behavior have been named as both the government and the private sector who both attempt to gather important information about the needs of the population, as well as for the purposes of detecting and preventing crimes in the case of most government-related surveillance. However, there are other reasons why people are involved in this behavior, such as those who do it simply to invade people's privacy for selfish and monetary gain. In such cases, people who are highly skilled in using the Internet may use this knowledge to punish or access the private information of others and ultimately abuse this power. Government surveillance is therefore very useful, especially for those who are unaware and are victims of such behavior. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the Original EssayIn the case of the United States, the government carries out routine mass surveillance via the Internet, primarily for security reasons. Before the tragic and horrific terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in the United States, citizens, especially those in the private sector, were uncomfortable with their government monitoring their Internet activities because they saw it as an interference in their privacy and a violation of their privacy. of their Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment protects American citizens against “unreasonable searches and seizures…”. Despite this unease, the government has increased its surveillance of the Internet and any other means that could be used to pose a direct threat to security in order to curb any future incidents that might occur, such as the September 11 attacks. Since the attack, there has been a significant change in the general attitude towards government surveillance due to concerns about.