The benefits of embryonic stem cell research outweigh the moral burdens because of the countless viable benefits it can offer the clinical community. Stem cell research is an important debate that still lacks agreement. The question is, are stem cells examining a controversial topic or is society simply contradicting itself? Stem cell research has become a dubious subject given three determining elements: political impact, religion, and finally moral and moral convictions; and when these three elements are taken into account, it makes the portable Stem query a basic controversial topic in America. Undifferentiated cells were first detected in 1978 in human blood, meaning that researchers had decided that some cells in the structure could produce platelets. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay By the time the first versatile line of vitro strains was created from mice, it led to the revelation of the major portable embryonic line from humans. Furthermore, only two or three years later, a sheep was cloned from undifferentiated organisms. Regardless, it was not until 2001 that the United States established an agreement on undifferentiated embryonic organisms, at the following location: "President George W. Hedge declared an agreement that would allow researchers to use government money to get answers about undifferentiated embryonic organisms.” As research funding has expanded, progressive and unimaginable measurements have been obtained from these exceptional cells. Stem cells are cells that have the ability to transform into many types of cells in the body. Stem cells are unique from all other cell types in the body because they are non-specialized cells that have the ability to rapidly self-replicate. It no longer depends on an individual's age, as stem cells will always have the ability to adapt to their body. Once a stem cell realizes what section of an organ or tissue it is being injected into, it immediately adapts to that environment. Once stem cells adapt, they undergo cell division to self-replicate into several other healthy cells. Ultimately, stem cells have the ability to treat several diseases such as: Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, birth defects and injuries. of the spinal cord, and they also play an essential role in most cancers. So far, there are two types of stem cells that are determined in animals and humans, namely embryonic and somatic stem cells. Somatic stem cells can be found in the single organs of adults. Somatic cells are rare cells found in some adult organs. However, these cells have a limited capacity for self-replication and adaptation to different environments in the body. But they could still reproduce into healthy new cells if they were placed in the original part of the body from which they were taken. The second type of stem cell is called an embryonic stem cell. While somatic stem cells come from adults, embryonic stem cells are stem cells from a three- to five-day-old historical embryo.Embryonic stem cells have the potential to seriously change and replicate in any type of cell or tissue in the body. Unlike somatic cells, embryonic stem cells can not only replicate in any cell present in the body, but their replication system occurs at a speed three times faster than that of somatic cells. This ability that embryonic stem cells possess is capable of curing diseases at a much faster rate than somatic cells could ever achieve. However, stem cell research would no longer have been possible without the help and funding of this study from political influences. Political and governmental These influences are the main reason why stem cell research is considered a critical controversial topic in America. Almost every political figure wants to make their point at some point during their term in office. And to advance their own campaigns, politicians manipulate, motivate, and influence the public into delivering the changes they want in America. Governments around the world have passed rules to standardize all stem cell research, but the United States has passed laws prohibiting the design of embryos solely for the purpose of stem cell research. Jacqueline Langwith said in her article "Introduction to Stem Cells: Opposing Views: "Some American proponents of embryonic stem cell research found it frustrating that such a vast research accomplishment had taken place in the United States. They felt that this illustrated how stem cell research in the United States was lagging behind that of other countries due to government restrictions on federal funding. In 2001, President George W. Bush had. "Limited federal funding to research using only already existing strains of stem cells." Scientists were only allowed to use embryos that were no longer needed in fertility clinics. erupted when political events clashed over the approach to funding stem cell research. In another scholarly article titled “The Public, Political Parties, and Stem Cell Research,” Blendon states: “Republicans. are much less favorable than the Democrats. About half of Republicans want medical research on embryonic stem cells and the others believe that this research should not be banned. Blendon also explains that each party had opposing views regarding funding for stem cell research and whether it should continue to become the United States' top priority. Furthermore, in the book The Stem Cell Dilemma, Furcht and Hoffman also explain how unique political figures had a particular stance on this issue. Indeed, George W. Bush didn't exactly think that stem cell research was once the most important topic for America. When Obama was chosen for president, he reversed Bush's stem cell policies and expanded the diversity of stem cell lines that were useful for stem cell research. The federal government allocates billions of dollars each year to biomedical research. However, once this money was divided for each biomedical research, there were no longer enough funds to fund stem cell research. This also brought the partiespoliticians to argue over whether more funding should be received from taxes or whether the available funding should be sufficient. The longer stem cell research is delayed, the more time, money and new registrations are wasted. Political events and government figures debate this time-dependent issue, proving that stem cell research is a critical debate for America. Aside from political influences, religion also makes stem cell research a key controversial topic because for the first time it has created a barrier between science and research involving embryonic stem cells and others believe that such research should not be prohibited. unlike two-thirds of Democrats. Blendon also explains that each party had opposing views regarding funding for stem cell research and whether it should continue to become the United States' top priority. Additionally, in the book The Stem Cell Dilemma, Furcht and Hoffman similarly explain how unique political figures had a particular stance on this issue. True to his words, Bush cut federal funding for cell lines. , which over time destroyed many embryos and slowed the pace of research. Bush's selection sparked more than one heated argument with other politicians during his term who needed this research. Then, when Obama was chosen for president, he unseated Bush, expanded coverage of stem cells and expanded the wide variety of stem cell lines that had been useful for stem cell research. The federal government allocates billions of dollars each year to biomedical research. However, once this money was divided for each biomedical research, there were no longer enough funds to fund stem cell research. This has also led political parties to ask themselves whether either we should no longer obtain more funding from taxes, or the accessible funding should be sufficient. The money came from taxpayers, and then taxpayers opposed to the study fought over where their money went. The longer stem cell research is delayed, the more time, money and new registrations are wasted. Additionally, the fact that political events and government figures are debating this time-dependent issue proves that stem cell research is a critical debate for America. Aside from political influences, religion also makes stem cell research a key controversial topic because for the first time in records it has created a barrier between science and equality as human beings and because they must have ethical rights. Another moral situation. available to society is human reproductive cloning, which can take place using embryonic stem cells. Using embryonic stem cells, scientists are able to clone reproductive human embryos which, in appropriate environments, are able to continue to exist and develop as ordinary human beings. This assumed that scientists had figured out, by hook or by crook, how to clone babies, since there were nevertheless some scientific uncertainties. This is another major ethical concern for society and individuals. In fact, human cloning has put aside the old question of embryo destruction and is now the main concern.223702/