Moreover, the refusal of the sending state to dismiss a diplomat who has committed a crime and thus annul his privileges before the Vienna Convention of 1961 had a great influence. All these situations have a negative influence on the lives of diplomats. State. Human distrust and disruption are growing. Plaintiffs whose allegations target diplomats cannot win the case, even if they are right. By these words, I do not mean to claim that the privileges and immunities of diplomats should be canceled. No, of course not. The cancellation of such important things would lead to chaos in cooperation between states, but I would like to emphasize the importance of creating an institution that would monitor diplomatic immunities and privileges that are exceeded and protect people from diplomatic abuses. States need such privileges and immunities and they are not a relic of the past, they are still important, but their permissiveness in some respects is horrifying. Of course, states tried to resolve disputes and situations regarding diplomats in court. The best examples are the kidnapping of the wife of a Salvadoran diplomat by two Guatemalan diplomats. Consequently, after the American negotiations with